If you found this file in an archive then put keyword "nutteing2" in a
search engine to find a live / recent version. This and associated files have been on the internet more than 3 years now, known to all concerned in Wiltshire and strange as it may seem nothing libellous in any of the files.
The 1996 Defamation Act amended the Limitation Act of 1980 to give a time limit
of one year for any libel action. I informed all the corrupt bastards in Wiltshire in 2000 and
since then have received no rebuttal letters from individuals or solicitors and no writs.
But of course the main reason there is no libel is the files are just straight
reporting of events without any invention on my part. All the files have been
recorded (on www.archive.org ) totally independently with the first file archived
on 19 September 2000 and more than 40 versions of the files over the months and
years since.
Despite official government sites linking to these files there are
still corrupt persons knocking out my sites, so for the
purposes of searchengines cross-linking them, files no longer
available on the original web hosting sites were on http://www.nutteing.freeukisp.co.uk,
http://www.nutteing.50megs.com/nutteing2.htm , http://www.nutteing.freeisp.co.uk/nutteing2.htm,
http://nutteing.no-frills.net/nutteing2.htm and http://nutteing3.no-frills.net/nutteing2.htm and http://www.nutteing.dabsol.co.uk/nutteing2.htm (last 3 due now to host failure)
http://www.nutteing.batcave.net/nutteing2.htm , http://home.graffiti.net/nutteing/nutteing2.htm File updated Nov, 2010
Crown v Paul NUTTEING
to be heard at Salisbury Magistrates
Court 26th February, 2001, 10. 00 am
Charge Sheet Between 16th June
1997 and 9th September 2000 at Salisbury in the County of Wiltshire pursued a
course of conduct which amounted to harassment of STELLA CONSTANT and which you
knew or ought to have known amounted to the harassment of her in that BETWEEN
1996 AND 2000 YOU CONTINUOUSLY SENT UNWANTED LETTERS TO STELLA CONSTANT, FAMILY
MEMBERS AND PLACES OF EMPLOYMENT ALSO PLACING AN ARTICLE ON THE INTERNET ALL OF
WHICH CAUSED STELLA CONSTANT HARASSMENT AND DISTRESS CONTRARY TO SECTION 2(1)
AND (2) OF THE PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 1997
Bail Conditions: Not
to contact directly or indirectly Stella CONSTANT, Kelvin DAWSON, Andrew
DAWSON, Honoria CONSTANT, Pauline DAWSON and John STODDART.
Neither Jane Warren nor Roger Norman Thomas Jones , Head of Wiltshire CPS, of 119
Semington Rd, Melksham dared to take this case to court. They would not
forward pre-trial disclosures to my solicitor of the forged letter JBS1
submitted as police evidence by John Barton STODDART or the criminal record of
Stella Maria CONSTANT. The implied earlier criminal record of Stella CONSTANT
is something else that Wilts Social Services should investigate. The reasons
for the discontinuance will become even more apparent reading the following file
. They had over five months to do so; three more weeks and it would have
been automatic abuse of process for this sort of trial. This scheduled trial
had to be specially empanelled. Because the two complicitous social workers
operated regularly in Salisbury courts, magistrates from well out of area had to
be found to avoid a prejudicial environment.
The solicitor, or whoever, in the precincts of Salisbury Magistrates gave me this
great sheaf of 120 pages or so from Wiltshire CPS marked "DEFENCE" and told me
do with it what I thought best. The other defendants hanging around seemed to
just have 2 or 3 sheets marked "DEFENCE". So here it is on the internet as I
think that is best. Police Interview and Witness Statements.
Note -names are real
except the names of innocent persons whose identities have been marked _ or
withheld. * marks edited words until after the trial. Homonyms have been
corrected e. g ( treat is ) amended to ( treatise ). Text in square brackets [
] is editorial comment. I have in my possession copies of the two audio tapes
of this police interview .
Form MG 15(T) Wiltshire Constabulary Record of Interview Person
Interviewed Paul Nutteing [recorded as R] Date of interview 9. 9. 00
Time commenced 2011 Interviewing officers WPC 1084 Nicki Griffin / DC 385
Sean Memory No other persons present.
Introductions made NUTTEING
advised of right to free and independent legal advice and cautioned 1084__
The reason that I arrested you this evening in relation of on suspicion of
harassment w as following a complaint that I received from a Miss Stella
Constant who came into the Police Station back in April of this year and she
made a complaint to me that over a period of approximately four years since 1996
up until ... R_____ As long as that two years okay 1084__ The present
day that you have bombarded her and her family R_____Not bombarded, I take
exception to that, it was about half a dozen letters over three years I'd have
said, well she says four years , maybe four years. It's not what I call bombarded
. 1184__ Can I explain the reason that you were interviewed. R_____ Yes
1184__ That you bombarded her family, her friends, neighbours and employers
with literally hundreds of unwanted and unanswered letters R_____No not
hundreds, unsolicited letters I agree with but unless someone has totalized the
figure I wouldn't say it was hundreds. 1184__ Okay. At that time when she
came in, back in April, she made a complaint and made a written statement in
relation to the harassment that she felt that you were causing her by sending
those letters and she requested that you be advised to cease this course of
conduct which is causing harassment. I arranged with Hampshire Police for
somebody to come round and visit you in May of this year, May 2000 and a WPC
VIVIAN replied to my letter saying that she'd call round to see you and advised
you to cease in your course of conduct which is called the harassment.
R_____ Well as far as you go yes 1184__ Okay R_____But she actually
stated to cease sending letters to her , that is a whoever the complainant was
which she didn't identify. I later phoned, I later contacted you by writing to
find out who the complainant was. 1184__ Okay R_____She didn't tell me
at the time 1184__ This all took place in May, Miss CONSTANT returned to the
Police Station back in I think August of this year and said that she was
continuing to be harassed by your conduct R_____I haven't harassed her at
all. Her family has been harassing her if anyone I haven't. It's pointless
sending letters to her. 1184__ She feels harassed by the course of conduct
which you are continuing with and wish to make a formal complaint of harassment
against you. R_____ The people I've sent letters to are entitled to call up
the police, even send the letters back to me or whatever. I've not harassed
her, I've not sent a letter for well over a year, it was March 1999 was the last
letter I sent. 1184__ Okay R______That was the last 1184__ What I'd
like to go through with you , I've got some , some of the copies of some of the
original letters, not all of them, I haven't brought all of them down with me, but
basically to go through what Miss CONSTANT said in her statement. in her
complaint against you and I'll go through this with you and then ask your
opinions once I've gone through that with you. Do you understand R_____Yeah
385___ I think what we could do to start with is perhaps you could tell us a
bit of your history and how you know Stella and how it's led to you being here
today. R_____ I can enter up the whole lot written out here there's about
60K of words , didn't I send a copy to you. 385___ Yeah R_____Yes it's
because it's in the public domain not under my name. 1184__ What I'm, what
we want you to do is explain to us how you know Stella, how you became ...
R_____ She, She .. 1184__ How you became involved .... R_____ Okay
1184__ And what's led up ....... R_____ The basic problem is roughly
twenty years ago, 1976, she had a daughter, well I can show you if you like, was
registered, birth register with the father who is someone who is infertile and
therefore cannot be the father and someone who she later married and in fact
five years later married. She, she left me for whatever reason prior to the
birth and I'll find the [documentary material], it's here somewhere. I'll take
that lot out. 385___ You say this man's infertile, how do you know that
R_____Stella told me, she told me the sperm count and everything and in fact
he was tested twice that you might say that's hearsay, I mean that's, I've no
access to his medical records but that is , if you formally want me to admit as
evidence, cos it's not, it's a photocopy. 1184__ For the purpose of the tape
Mr NUTTEING is showing us the Birth Certificate of Naomi Leafe DAWSON.
R_____ The main point is the name of father as K D DAWSON 1184__ Who as
Stella has stated in her statement is not the biological father she's stated
that you are the biological father of ... R_____ She actually stated that
did she in the statement. 1184__ Yes 385___ Yes R_____Oh right okay
. 1184__ Yes that's not really in dispute she stated in her statement that
she separated from you before the birth. R_____ But that is perjury as such
. She knowingly put down a false statement to a crown official. 1184__
Where was the birth registered. R_____ Signed , signed by both parties.
When it was registered. 1184__ Where R____ Ah, Southampton, Bugle Street
as far as I know. 1184__ They would be offences that would have to be
investigated by. R_____ Well the CPS have started investigating it
already, back in April that's why I have had to be interviewed by Hampshire
Police on that, in fact I had a follow up interview as well about other stuff
relating to it. 1184__ Okay R____ Anyway I actually pleaded with her to
come back and live with me again after the daughter was born and the same thing
happened again, she left prior to the son being born, but at least this time he
was registered as illegitimate but given Kelvin's surname although they were
married three years later, whatever that is perjury I've no idea probably is but
it's false anyway, false information. That's how it started I never knew about
that, it was only cos my daughter found by whatever means I dunno, I didn't
contact her. I suspect who did contact her but I've no proof .. Ah, in about
August 1996 she phoned me up saying straight off, I believe you are my father
which I wouldn't deny, that's how it started but her informant that's my
daughter's informant never told her about her son, [error] her, her brother being
unrelated to this Kelvin Derrick DAWSON that's what it comes down to and then
sort of continuing to , conspiring to disguise all this perjury and lying to my
daughter so that she actually wrote to me cutting off all contact because
according to her I was lying and deluded. I hadn't actually lied at all about
anything except one thing to disguise her mother's behaviour but I got found out
on that but that's very much a summary of it but the basic idea. 1184__ And
as a result of this what was your actions R_____I expected of course I'm not
dealing with an honourable person, but I suspect that it's dragged on so long
that it ruined my daughter's education at university, it's going to ruin, well
let's call her son's education probably and because me daughter one of the
reasons long before she contacted me knew .. I didn't go into details, what the
blood groups were of her mother and Kelvin. I assume cos Kelvin might have a
military passport so put me right if I'm wrong but anyway she found out that his
blood group which she referred to as quite a rare blood group, she didn't
actually say group B, but a rare, quite a rare blood group and she expected to
have the same rare blood group and she doesn't, she has blood group A which is my
blood group so it would be very easily arranged with my GP, that it's quite a
standard procedure as long as everyone agrees, that GP will contact GP, exchange
letters confirming blood groups. If Fian was blood group B then he couldn't
possibly be related to me and that's the end of it. It wouldn't if he was A it
wouldn't mean that I was the father but at least it would show that this Stella
woman is lying through her teeth and that he couldn't possibly be the father.
But it could have been easily settled in 1997 but now it's dragged out till this
silly extent of smashing windows and god knows what but that is it. 1184__
Could you explain who you've sent letters to R_____I think that's more up to
you to tell me but certainly family, a couple of friends. 1184__ When I
mentioned that Miss CONSTANT had mentioned hundreds of letters what estimate
would you put at. R_____ No, cos I haven't religiously sent the same letters
to the same people each time but I would say on average five to however many
people that she says I've been sending letters to but it's certainly not twenty
people I've been sending letters to, twenty people to make a hundred letters you
know 385___ And why have you been sending letters to these people.
R_____ Well I'll plead my case with anyone who's prepared to listen and all
these people have, not a single one until two weeks ago , I got a round robin
which this is a photocopy of on two sides from the four named people that this
was the first indication in what she says four years, I'd say three years that
anyone has not appreciated my letters, there's no threats in them. 385___
You say that you've never had a reply from any have you R____ I've not had a
reply from anyone so far. I assume that was acceptable. I mean if you find
letters offensive you ... 1184__ Do you know these people R_____No, I
mean I met Mr DAWSON five or six years ago accidentally but other than that no.
No they're all unsolicited letters. 385___ How did you find their details
to send them to R____ This was standard procedure for genealogy sort of
thing, genealogy, but, the Catherine House Index you're not familiar with that.
[ For the assistance of anyone alighting on this file because of the person
tracing aspects here is someone's file birth parent tracing story
, otherwise skip] 1184__ No 385___ No R_____You're kidding have
you never heard of the St Catherine's House Index 1184__ No R_____Oh
right, do you want me to explain I mean ... 385___ Yeah R_____Since 1837
to the current day every birth, marriage and death is registered locally, in this
case [holding up Leafe's birth certificate] in Bugle Street, Southampton. All
the records are collated on a three monthly basis and sent to the National
General Record Office, GRO. They are over all collated together nationally in
that sense and I don't know since when but certainly for decades they've been
released to county by county in reference, usually records offices or reference
libraries on - I can't believe I'm telling you this - but anyway accessible by
anyone, you know a member of the public, private detectives, anyone like that.
It's not illegal and there's enough information there then to apply for a copy of
the certificate which is again perfectly legal to do, whether birth, marriage or
death certificate for someone related or unrelated, it's quite standard procedure
. 1184__ And from that index you can get peoples addresses can you.
R_____ No, I mean we're talking about old information I think this is 1976
[Leafe's registration in front of us]. I could have got their marriage
certificate if I wanted to, that would have been 1981 but after 1992 you have to
apply to the individual registry office, which you can access but it costs a bit
more, it costs about £30 to have access to the indexes directly as distinct from
the microfiches that go to the record offices. 1184__ Where do you get
people's addresses from R_____Addresses from, well the voter's list
1184__ Okay R____ Again open information it's not illegal. 385___
What were you hoping to achieve by writing to all these people. R_____ Well
I was getting nowhere with this woman, I mean I had sent her two or three
letters, gradually, well other than she'd be shouting and bawling down the phone
in the middle of the night, harassment if you like but is actually. Absolutely
getting nowhere but I decided, right, plead my case with as many people I could
contact and that was what I did which is what I did and it has had an effect.
1184__ So what did you think would happen when you sent letters to people.
R_____ Well say one of these people here is an Andrew DAWSON and he is the
younger brother of Kelvin DAWSON, well presumably they had the same parents or
did have the same parents [their father died in 1986] and the same blood group
so if I wrote a letter to him claiming that his brother had blood group B and
this Andrew was blood group A, I'd expect him to write back a bit
seriously, indignantly, and put me right or anything else. It was highly specific
letters I was sending. 1184__ What about the other people on this list
R_____Ah that's the mother of Mrs CONSTANT and that's the mother of the two
DAWSONS 1184__ What did you want to achieve by writing to them R_____The
same, get some dialogue going, getting somewhere but nothing came back, no
rejection letters, not a thing, not from any of them, amazing but 385___ Did
you think that Stella would find out about the letters R_____Well more than
likely 385___ It was quite obvious really wasn't it if it was a family of
hers they say that you've written R_____Assuming they're on speaking terms
with one another but if she-. I know one friend who was friends with this
Stella woman for twenty years but is totally non-friends now, they're totally
antagonistic over this, obviously, cos, well I assume, they believe me or she
believes me rather than believes Stella. 385___ And what about writing to
her boss R_____That was after the window was smashed yes, I mean. I happen
to know someone who works for the Samaritans and going around smashing windows
is not a rational way by any means and it's often a precursor to suicide and
there's other medical argy-bargy that's ... 385___ I disagree with that
R_____Well he's a doctor, he's a doctor who's a councelor with the
Samaratans 385___ We have a number of people in here for criminal damage and
... R_____ Oh yeah if you're talking about drunks leaving a pub and kicking
windows or smashing windows that's a different matter, this was
premeditated, targeted. 385___ That's what you'll say it's not what Stella
will say R_____Well I don't know I mean she came from here to * , contacted
her, well I wont say her name but her friend who lives in * and she, this
friend, brought her to my new pub which Stella wouldn't know anything about. Why
I don't know, this Stella woman started stalking me around the pub. I said quite
loudly to everyone who could hear but not shouting that if she had anything to
say then put it in writing, that's what I've been trying to get her to do for
years, and she, I upped and left and she came round, same business again so I went
right down to the other end of the pub, finished my pint and left and then an
hour later almighty great cracking and banging from the front door at
home, trying to break in including, cos there's a street light outside my glass
door, trying to slide a credit card down the slot and using her keys to try and
activate the lock with her own keys or something but then my neighbour said
perhaps he's round **, which is just around the corner, neighbouring road, and she
went round there and kicked this huge window in. 1184__ That's all been
investigated hasn't it. R_____ Yes it was processed by Hampshire Police as
far as I know. 1184__ So that's been investigated by Hampshire Police and
am I right in saying that she's agreed to pay for the damage R_____In
principle or some of the damage, it's ... 1184__ So that matter has been
resolved in that respect .. R_____ Well no it's in the process 1184__
Well it's in the process of being resolved, is that correct R_____It's being
processed, I don't know about resolved 1184__ You mentioned that you hadn't
written to her employer other than about this window. I understand from her
statement that she made back in April which is obviously prior to the window
that you'd contacted her boss at that time and you sent a letter with the
web-site details on. R_____ Not me. No I sent a letter when was it, I've got
a reply back from them somewhere, something about it being .. 1184__ So that
must have been sent prior to April of this year R_____As far as I know I
sent, I sent two letters to Mr STODDART I think it was, here we are. The
first one was 30th May and then one recently this notification that failed to
get through to her about taking her to civil proceedings in small claims court.
385___ You sent it prior to that window being damaged then
R_____Sorry, what prior to 385___ You sent him a letter prior
R_____No the window was smashed on 28th May 1184__ So if I speak to Mr
STODDART he will confirm that he's had no contact with you prior to that date
R_____Oh I contacted, what was her name MIDDLETON or something or other.
That's right I addressed the letter to Mrs MIDDLETON. I think it was the wrong
department and she sent the letter on to Mr STODDART 1184__ When was that
R_____A week or two before this ... 1184__ What I'm saying is had you
made contact with her employer before the window had been smashed
R_____No, cos, I mean I wrote it on the 30th May but not to Mr STODDART he ...
1184__ I'm not , I'm not talking specifically I mean anyone at her place of
employment, had you written to any person at her place of employment prior to the
window being smashed R____ No, but not before this one, it hasn't got a date
on there so, ah the 16th June, yeah, sorry 1184__ Cos, when Mrs CONSTANT made
her statement in April she sent, mentioned in her statement that you'd contacted
her employer and left a Web-site detail and implied that she wasn't a fit person
to be doing her job or words to that effect R_____No 1184__ So you're
disputing that that's taken place R_____Yeah I have written to her employer
but .. 1184__ You're saying it all took place after 30th May R_____Mm
1184__ You're adamant about that R_____Yeah 385___ And have you
written saying she's unfit R_____Well yes, I was referring to the suicide
thing 385___ But that's your opinion the suicide, it's not fact is it
R_____Yes but I mean she's dealing with children and other peoples
families, look at what she's done to her own family, I'd hate to think that ...
385___ But what sort of effect would that have had on her at work
R_____She should get herself sorted out 1184__ Going back to making
contact with her employer, did you make contact in any other way than writing.
Did you fax him R_____No 1184__ Or send a computer message R_____I
didn't even know what the name of the employer was cos the original letter I
sent to a different department, I mean Social Services but it wasn't actually
directed to him 1184__ What about Mrs CONSTANT's neighbours
R_____Yes, yes I sent them one letter each I think 1184__ One letter each
and what did you hope to achieve by that because surely they wouldn't have been
blood relations of .. R_____ I can't remember they were long term neighbours
1184__ Fian R_____Long term neighbours, I was just trying to find out
what's happened to my daughter and things. I mean the last contact I had with
her was in Leicester two years ago and I couldn't, I wouldn't get anything out of
her parents so I thought I might get some information out of the neighbours but
I was wrong on that count, they obviously sent the letters straight next door ,
both of them and that was the end of that 385___ You must have thought that
was going to happen though when you were writing about Stella in letters
R_____No, no there was nothing offensive in there but .. 385___ Well in
your opinion R_____ Well I mean it's not like what I think really of
harassing people, pushing dog shit through letterboxes and things like that, that
is 385___ But I think it's very harassing that you've written to her work
and claimed that she may be suicidal and that's purely conjecture on your part
you've got no evidence, no experience about that at all R_____ Yeah, I quite
agree so it's .. 385___ That's quite a cruel thing to say really ...
R_____ It's very justifiable, I think. I mean if she was a Traffic Warden ..
385___ Well she's not suicidal though R_____ If she was a Traffic Warden
or something like that it would be a different matter but ... 385___ She's
not suicidal, she's not been assessed, she's not needed any assessment and she's
not suicidal so it's a cruel lie. You've based it on damage to a window
R_____ And all that goes along with it but ... 385___ But what sort
of, you know, when the boss picks that up what is he supposed to think R_____
What he is supposed to think. That it needs a bit of investigating, check out
there isn't some foundation there ... 1184__ You must have known that when
you made that contact that that's going to cause her some sort of distress to
her R_____ Imagine the distress to me. I can't afford to replace this
window [10 ft x 6 ft , 8 mm thick plate glass] 1184__ You must have known that
when you sent that letter to her boss mustn't you R_____ To her boss
385___ What were you hoping for her to get the sack R_____ No I was
hoping for her to get treated 385___ Surely she's the one if she wants
treatment to seek it herself R_____ No it's up to her family and GPs and
things 385___ She hasn't seen you for twenty years or so. Why are you the
fount of all knowledge on whether she should have treatment R_____ I can't, I
can't get her committed I mean it's up to her husband and other people, I can't
do it. 385___ In those twenty years since this baby was conceived why have
you, cos you knew she was pregnant didn't you .. R_____ What with the
daughter 385___ Yeah R_____ Mm, oh yes 385___ Why did you leave it
twenty years without any contact for your own daughter ... R_____ What you
mean I should go out trying to contact my own daughter. Imagine the trouble
that would cause. It was my daughter that contacted me, not me ... 385___
But for those previous twenty years you didn't care a thing about your daughter
R_____ I've got no proof she was. She was going around with at least four
different people including the person who later was her husband. This is by her
own mouth I'm not talking about rumour. I've got no proof and she, I was, I was
told that my daughter was registered illegitimate. It 's only finding out
all this family history stuff, finding out and getting a copy of birth
registration details that I found, well perjury. It was conspiracy with Kelvin
1184__ What do you, what effect do you think this has had on her all of these
letters that you've been sending to her employer and friends R_____ Well my
argument is it could so easily have been resolved, all she had to do was divulge
a few blood groups and agree for GPs to swap details. 385___ What happens
if she doesn't want to do that R_____ But why doesn't she, she wants to get
rid of me surely, get rid of all this nonsense 1184__ That wasn't a question
I said, what effect do you think that's, this, all this had had on her R_____ I
really don't know so 385___ Do you care R_____ Care, I'm caring
indirectly cos I know the effect it's had on my daughter while I was still in
contact with her but, she just took her, took her mother's side and sent me a
letter saying I was deluded and lying to her and that's the last contact I've
had with her. I don't know where she's living. 1184__ Are you still in
contact with your daughter R_____ No, she just totally broke off contact
385___ But Fian has made it quite clear he will ... R_____ He hasn't
written to me, oh he ... 385___ He's made it quite clear that ... R_____
He phoned me up one time shouting and bawling down the phone 385___ He's
made it quite clear that at no point will he undertake any test R_____ Has
he, well he's not said that to me or anything 385___ So that really should be
the end of it R_____ Not as far as I'm concerned 385___ You can't force
him to take a test R_____ I can't force him no 1184__ He's an adult now
isn't he R_____ Mm mm 1184__ And it would be an assault for anybody to
force him to do, take a test and he's refusing to R_____ But I would have
thought everyone would want it cleared out of the air 385___ It's not
something , it's not something the family need clearing cos they're quite happy
that Kelvin is the father R_____ He can't be 385___ Well you've only
got, we've only got your word for that R_____ Indirect but genetic evidence
385___ When did she move out from you then, when did you last have sex with
her R_____ Oh, I vaguely remember it might have been a few occasions after
she was married but the odd occasions anyway in the late 70s I mean after both
were born. 385___ You say you've had sex with her after the birth of both
children [If this interview had been recorded on video tape you would be
able to see both bottom jaws drop in astonishment at this point] R_____
Yeah, yeah, not very often but a few occasions, the late 70s, you know, but there's
always other people that could have been the father as well, which I'm not going
to name but .. 1184__ When Fian spoke to you on the telephone did he make it
quite clear that he wasn't going to entertain the idea of having a blood test
R_____ He was, that was it as addled as his mother on these occasions at the
same time of night as well, trying to think, he was shouting and swearing
, couldn't really make, didn't really say anything, that's right, it was after I
sent the letters to the neighbours, that's right, so immediately or within a day
or two of that so that was, cos whenever I sent any letters it seemed to have
some sort of effect, got things going, might of gone in the wrong direction I mean
I've no way of predicting that but, but at least he, someone, that was the thing
that wound him up. Someone I've never spoken to before, wouldn't recognise the
voice at all, purporting to be Fian DAWSON. I've got no proof of that which is
what I said on the phone, especially at one o'clock in the morning. Get woken
up, that really wound him up, I assume it was him, it might have been a plant by
anyone, I just don't trust this Stella CONSTANT woman at all, it could have been
anyone 385___ What are you hoping to achieve by proving you're the
biological father cos you haven't been a father to them R_____ That I
haven't lied to my daughter basically. Just one thing I'd lied to my daughter
about and that was the, the night she was almost born. Stella came round, we'd
separated months beforehand, she came round and we were having sex and Stella
started haemorrhaging and we rushed up the hospital. Medically I don't know
if, if the doctors suppressed the birth. It would have otherwise been due then or
what anyway she, it was suppressed and patched up and she was, she was giving birth
two weeks later. But I had sent a diary of events or whatever you'd like to
call it, of our relationship , when we were living together, when we weren't living
together and I had quite deliberately disguised that we were having sex, although
on odd occassions, although we'd separated but I had mentioned this thing about
she, did her mother ever tell her that she was born almost two weeks earlier, or
ten days early or something like that. She was just pestering me and pestering
me to get an explanation of the otherwise strange event of being born too early
and eventually I had to explain that I'd misled her. I hadn't actually lied to
her, I had misdirected her, implied that we were living together and we separated
and there wasn't any ongoing odd occasions in between 385___ Was it
important to your daughter then to know that she might have been born two weeks
early R_____ No, no the point is that's the only time I've lied to my
daughter but what I've no idea what her mother's been telling her but she's
firmly of the opinion that I'm deluded or lying or both or a thoroughly nasty
person and ... 385___ Could you now leave them though just to be a family
unit and get on with their lives R_____ Get all this stuff out of the way.
I'd have done it three years ago. I mean we've got incompatible blood groups
385___ Yes but they've already told you that they're not prepared to undergo
tests so at some point you have to stop R_____ Well it will just niggle away
with them for the rest of their lives in that case but .. 1184__ What you'll
niggle away with them for the rest of their lives R_____ Not necessarily but
it will niggle at their own consciences 385___ That may be the case
but you, but you, have to stop harassing them when they've said they're not going
to entertain a test, which is why you haven't had a single reply to any letter
you ever sent R_____ I don't know she. I mean no one's contacted me at all
so I've no reason of knowing why they haven't got back to me .. 385___ Isn't
it all an indication though that if people don't reply that they're not
particularly interested R_____ I'd soon reply to a letter I found
offensive, anyway it had my name and address on the top, fully identified
385___ Why do you think they didn't reply R_____ Because it is very
informative information. They were probably getting a load of rubbish from
Stella as usual, and they're believing me. But on the other hand they couldn't
really get back to me cos it was implying that they're sister or whatever was
being a habitual liar 1184__ I expect they didn't get back to you because
the whole family knew .. R_____ I don't know, all I know is ... 1184__
Knew of these letters R_____ This was the first occasion [the round-robin in
front of me ] 1184__ And chose to ignore them because they didn't want to be
contacted ... R_____ This is the first occasion anyone has communicated
with me [round robin photocopy] 385___ But once you don't get a reply to a
letter surely that's some indication the people don't want to talk to you
R_____ Well I'd say the opposite 1184__ Especially as you don't know any
of these people R_____ Well all the more reason for them to write back
saying, a perfectly civil letter saying that, I received your letter of so and so
... 385___ Which after three years they have done R_____ After three
years exactly, three years, but not that many letters, I mean five or six letters
over three years 1184__ Each R_____ Well five on average I would
say, four to some six to others something like that 1184__ What abut
Kelvin, Fian and Leafe, how many letters have you sent to them R_____ Well
Leafe I mean we were communicating perfectly amicably until the mother threw a
spanner in the works that. Sorry what was the question. 1184__ How many
letters have you sent to others in the family, not Stella R_____ I mean well
to Leafe, thirty letters or something. We were just trying to make contact with
one another there's nothing threatening in there, well nothing threatening in any
of the letters 1184__ What about Fian R_____ The same sort of number of
letters as everyone else, five I suppose, something like that 1184__ And
Kelvin DAWSON, her husband R_____ Maybe three I should think, probably only
three 1184__ And what about Stella herself R_____ Two maybe, no more than
three anyway but the last one of those was in March 1999, I don't actually have a
copy here but there is a transcript here 1184__ Do you keep records of all
letters you've sent R_____ Oh yes, yeah 1184__ Do you have copies at home
of all the letters that you've sent R_____ Not all of them because they tend
to be much the same and I just sort of recorded I sent one to so and so and it's
just the same letter and I just sort of put in my records that I sent the same
copy to so and so 1184__ And what about the Web-site you set up R_____
That oh yeah, yes sorry what about it 1184__ What was the purpose of setting
up the web-site R_____ Put it in the public domain and get some feedback from
people, cos I couldn't find how to deal with this sort of thing. I mean
basically I can't afford to put this stuff in a civil action, prosecute them, god
knows what that would cost 385___ What are you hoping to prosecute
R_____ Oh this disputed paternity 385___ Without their consent they
won't give the blood so it can't go anywhere can it R_____ No it had to go
before a judge and he would have to decide the merits of the case as far as I
know 385___ But he could decide the merits but he can't force people to take
blood tests R_____ Can't he 385___ No cos that constitutes an assault
without people's consent R_____ Well I think, I'll take your word for that, I
mean I've not read up on it much, I, I assumed well what is the point of people
going to paternity issues in courts if that's not the case. Are you sure about
that? 385___ Well we certainly can't take blood from anybody here without
their consent R_____ No but I mean if you went to a judge and he saw the
merits of a case then maybe he would 385___ How are you going to force
someone do it though if they don't want to R_____ By the courts. I mean if
you cut some of their hair off that's technically assault but it's been deemed
allowable by whatever act of parliament it's not assault in those circumstances
1184__ We don't want to dwell on that too much
Buzzer sounding on
tape
1184__ What that sound there means is that R_____ The end of
the tape 1184__ The end of the tape. There's still other things we need to
discuss with you so what I intend to do is conclude this tape and put a fresh
set in. The time by the interview clock is 2051 hours and the interview is
concluded
Continuation tape Duration of interview 41 minutes Time
commenced 2055 Time concluded 2136
1084__ Okay the time by the interview
clock is now 2055 hours the date is still Saturday the 9th of September
2000, we've just concluded tape number one and we're going onto tape number two
an interview with Paul NUTTEING. Can you confirm Mr NUTTEING that the same
people are present R_____ That's correct 1084__ And that we've had a
couple of minutes break so that you could visit the toilet R_____ That's
correct 1084__ And you're happy to continue with the interview R_____
Yeah it's fine 1084__ And you understand that you're still under caution
R_____ Yes 1084__ And we will continue where we left off with the
interview okay. Before we go any further I've got a couple of letters here
which Stella CONSTANT has given me, this one in particular is to Mrs R , I don't
intend to go through the content of all these letters R_____ No, fair enough
1084__ In particular but I just want you to confirm with this letter is
written the 26th of May 99 to Mrs R, can you confirm that that's your handwriting
R_____ Yeah it would be my letter yes. I don't actually remember it but yes
I mean it's my letter 1084__ And that's your signature at the bottom of the
letter R_____ That's right, yes, yes 1084__ And I think that might be it's
in biro, its another letter dated the 29th of March 2000 to Mr DAWSON again ...
R_____ Sorry which Mr DAWSON 1084__ Umm just says Mr DAWSON R_____
Probably says on the envelope who it is to. Yeah that's him 1084__ Again
which this signature at the bottom can you confirm that ... R_____ Yes that
signature's mine, yes 1084__ That's your handwriting and that you'd written
that. I'm just flicking through that there's a number of letters R_____ I
like to see there's hundreds of them ... 1084__ So you're not disputing that
that's your handwriting R_____ Oh no, no 1084__ Okay I refer, I can, if I
refer to Stella's statement it refers to the amount of letters, which she is
referring to have sent ... R_____ This is over three years bear in mind
1084__ And what's happened to them R_____ Sorry what's happened to
1084__ The letters R_____ I've no idea no one has come back to me saying
so ... 1084__ No I'll explain that to you. She states that she was in, in a
relationship and, with yourself in 199-1976 when she fell pregnant, she goes on to
, go on to say that Naomi was born, however after she was, prior to her being born
that you had separated, that you had an on off relationship, however at the time
she was registered, registered the birth, she was living as a couple with her now
husband Kelvin R_____ I don't dispute that 1084__ Kelvin DAWSON and it
was him who registered as Leafe's father on the birth certificate. She said
that her and Kelvin went on to have their son Fian and ... R_____ SHE
HAD A SON 1084__ They have since had ... R_____ In between we
were living, when he was conceived, when he was conceived ME and Stella were
living together 1084__ Going from what she's saying on her statement ...
R_____ All right okay yeah but .. 1084__ Okay she then goes on to say
she's had two further children with her husband and you know they now live in
Salisbury. She says that sometime in 1996 she doesn't know the exact date, she
had a telephone call from Leafe to say that she was upset and she wanted her
help, because she had been in contact with yourself and that you started to
bombard Leafe with letters, obsessive letters and this had upset Leafe and that
you were implying to Leafe that you knew things about her and making general
hurtful ... R_____ They weren't implications they were highly precise
detailed information 1084__ Comments that were upsetting Leafe and that's
why she went to her mother with her concerns. Stella states that Leafe had
showed her a pile of letters that you had sent her and that the letters were
manipulative and insinuated there were dark secrets, possibly criminal secrets
which related to Stella and the rest of her family. She states that you'd sent
her approximately 100 letters most of which ... R_____ 100 letters to who
1084__ To Leafe R_____ Laugh 1084__ Most of which were destroyed
however Leafe has kept a shoebox full at home, the letters did not contain any
actual threats, however they were extremely distressing and that most of the
contents were fabricated and twisted versions of the truth R_____ No, I've
never lied to my daughter at any time apart from the one specific occasion I
said 1084__ She states that as a result of these letters Leafe had asked her
to intervene and asked her to speak with you and she says that at that time that
she came to * and she said she compassionately asked you to try and deal with
your relationship with Leafe on amore appropriate level, can you confirm that
meeting took place R_____ I can confirm she came round to see me, the
conversation half of it was about Social Services matters nothing to do with
this at all. In fact, in fact talking about an ongoing investigation that
was, she shouldn't have been talking about at all, she was totally off her trolley
that day. In fact when I pointedly asked her who Fian's father was, biological
father, she said it was someone completely different someone I don't know. News
to me but 1084__ She said that she left this meeting on good terms with you
R_____ Well I didn't throw her out if that's what you mean 1084__ You
were disputing it was on good terms then R_____ I'm disputing that it was a
conversation, she was -what's the psychology, the psychiatry, she was in an
alternative personality. It's out of things, just irrational, you just can't have
a conversation with her. She just comes back with a politician's answer [
anterotesis ] , if you ask her a very precise question she'll just come back
saying Oh what you're implying I'm lying or something. She won't keep to
the subject, you just can't get anything out of her 1084__ She goes on to say
that approximately 6 months after this visit that she and Leafe heard nothing
and then all of a sudden that you started to bombard her with letters, saying
that you sent letters to her husband Kelvin DAWSON, her son Fian DAWSON, her
daughter Leafe DAWSON, her daughter-her mother Honoria CONSTANT, her mother-in-law
Pauline DAWSON her sister and husband Mr and Mrs R, another sister and her
husband Mr and Mrs E, her brother-in-law Andrew David -Andrew DAWSON, her
neighbours Mr and Mrs C, other neighbours M. D. and her place of work Salisbury
Social Services. I'll go back saying this letter, this statement was made in
April of this year prior to the window ... R_____ Not one to Mr STODDART at
all 1084__ So you're saying you made no contact with Mr STODDART or her
place of ... R_____ Well no, this is my letter dated the 30th ...
1084__ Work whatsoever. I'm not disputing you wrote that one, what I'm
saying is back in April she's saying that you made contact with her, with
Salisbury Social Services. I'm not saying Mr STODDART I'm saying Social
Services R_____ No 1084__ You're saying that's a lie R_____ It's
nothing to do with me 1084__ She said the contents of the letters most of
which she's seen were generally hurtful comments, lies and distortions about her
and her family R_____ I'd like to see some of these lies proved, she's very
handy at using the term lying. For someone who is a pathological liar. I
mean what do you call perjury if it's not lying 1084__ Well she's written
here also that ... R_____ I'll tell you this one thing that got up my wick.
She phoned me up one time, probably in the middle of the night, I don't
know, saying things were getting, her daughter was getting upset about all
this, that she didn't want me contacting my daughter anymore. At that point I
sort of said yes to calm things down. That very same week my daughter wrote me
a letter containing with it her mobile phone number precisely to make it easier
to contact my daughter. Her mother's just desperate to, I mean all this
gagging order basically I mean, trying desperately to get rid of me, a thorn in
her backside or something and my daughter wanted to give me her phone number
precisely to make it easier to contact her, but her mother was trying to push me
out 1084__ Stella goes, she goes on to say that other letters you refer to
her suffering from MPD, Multiple Personality Disorder R_____ Hm mm 1084__
Well how do you know that R_____ Well I've spoken to a psychiatric nurse
1084__ Are you an expert in that field R_____ I'm not no 385___
That's only what you've said to the nurse not what the nurse has seen of Stella
R_____ Oh not no not Stella at all no 385___ So that's in fact a lie
R_____ It's consistent isn't it, it's consistent with 1084__ It's not a
fact is it, you're writing letters R_____ I can't, I'm not er, I'm not
medically qualified or anything 385___ But you said she's suffering from it
and you don't know that she is. You've got no idea R_____ I can only go by
this strange behaviour 1084__ Yeah but that's just made up then isn't
it R_____ Sorry what's made up 1084__ The fact that she's got Multiple
Personality Disorder R_____ Well I hope it's that rather than schizophrenia
385___ No but you made it up, because you've got no evidence other than
you've spoken to someone R_____ I've got nothing in writing no no 385___
So you've made it up and you've written that in letters which is quite hurtful
isn't it, if it's not true R_____ If it's not true 1084__ So that's one
thing that we've pointed out that's a lie isn't it that you've written
R_____ Sorry what's, what's a lie 385___ That she's suffering from it
because you don't that R_____ It's the only explanation I've come across in
all this that fits 1084__ It's still actually, it's not a fact though is it
R_____ Well I'm not a psychiatrist so I've not 385___ No so you're not
in a position to make that comment but you did R_____ On, on the basis of
evidence that I have ... 385___ Because a lot of people might find your
behaviour completely irrational R_____ I quite believe it. That woman
drives everyone round the bend, certainly did twenty years ago so hasn't changed
now. Give her the benefit of the doubt to start with but ... 385___ But
that's your opinion isn't it. Which again isn't fact R_____ But it's not
necessarily lies 1084__ She says that you've accused her of trying to get
someone to kill you R_____ Sorry. Oh to my daughter yeah that's right yes.
That's genuine 1084__ Can you tell me about that R_____ I mean this is
going back 20 years. I mean we're talking about, if you don't mind going back 20
years 1084__ No R_____ No its not recently. It was when she left, that
was her parting , parting threat that if I should consider trying to contact her
daughter or her son then she's got these fairground workers who would come round
and set on me apparently 1084__ Sit on you R_____ Set on me 1084__
Set on you. She says that you talk about her being evil, corrupt and having
illegal activities and being immoral R_____ Could be. I mean I haven't got
it in front of me but it's possible 1084__ It's possible that you could have
written these things in a letter R_____ Well I don't know about a letter but
. 385___ What are her illegal activities then R_____ I don't think I
would have written in a letter but might have been in this public domain thing
385___ So what are her illegal activities R_____ What then 385___
You, you've obviously at some point written R_____ I'm trying to think what
these illegal activities are 385___ Or you made that up as well R_____
I'm just trying to think, what's it in contact with, context with illegal
activities 1084__ She's saying that these are her, some of the hurtful, she's
pointing out some of the hurtful things that you've written in some of the
letters R_____ No, there's reference to that sort of thing in this public
domain document that's on the internet 385___ Okay so in that then, so what
are these illegal activities that you've put in the public domain R_____ I'm
not sure they're illegal as such 385___ So why did you put illegal
activities R_____ Have I actually written illegal activity 1084__ I
haven't got any letters(incoherent)I've just got her statement without reading
through them which would take the rest of the night R_____ I'd certainly say
immoral activities and activities that wouldn't be consistent with being a
social worker I would have thought 1084__ Can I just clarify with
you, because you're talking about the Web-site, basically that being in the public
domain as being separate to the letters R_____ Yes yes some 1084__ And I
understand that R_____ I mean there's ... 1084__ I understand that
you've sent little booklets with this information from the web site in paper
form R_____ Yeah 1084__ To a lot of the people from Stella's family
R_____ With all names disguised and all that sort of thing 1084__ Is
that correct R_____ With all the names disguised, yes 1084__ Did you send
that booklet to anybody else like to her boss R_____ Maybe I could have
done, yes. Yes it's quite possible 1084__ Okay and when did you send that
R_____ Er probably with this, I can't be sure on that but you've got it
definitely in writing somewhere have you 1084__ I haven't spoken to her boss
at the moment but I can confirm that when what R_____ Yeah it's quite
possible it's just, you know, there's so many odd people and bits of paper it gets
a bit confusing 1084__ So you may have sent that too R_____ Yeah may
well have done yeah 1084__ Mr STODDART, but you can't recall when it was
R_____ Oh it was probably with the letter as contents 1084__ Could you
have sent it before then R_____ I doubt it cos I didn't even know ...
385___ If you had a grievance with Stella why haven't you gone through the
proper channels to sort the grievance out R_____ As far as I know it costs
in excess of 10, 000 probably £20, 000 these days 385___ As far as I know
R_____ As far as I know 385___ Have you considered Citizens Advice where
you get a free letter R_____ Sorry free letter 385___ Solicitors letter
to send her R_____ She'd just tear it up in front of her. 385___ So you
instead you ... R_____ I didn't consider it no I can't 385___ You harass
all her friends to try and get some response R_____ No I inform people as
best as I could give, basically plead my case with anyone who will listen to it
that's why 385___ Most of it is your opinion isn't it R_____ No most of
it is very precise genetic information 385___ Things like she's suffering
from Multiple Personality Disorder is your opinion because she's not been
assessed R_____ Oh that was later on in the ... 385___ That is your
opinion 1084__ It's also your opinion that your Fian's father R_____
Until proven otherwise yes 1084__ So they're all opinions it's not a fact is
it R_____ All someone has to do is come back to me saying whether he's got
this wonkey wrist business or short arms or what my daughter's got which is
Cubitus Valgus which is a cocked-over arm at the elbow. It's all part of the
same thing called Dyschondrosteosis
Dyschondrosteosis
385___ You're not the only family in the
world suffering from that are you R_____ It's one in five hundred thousand
so it's the same level as DNA or that area of probability. 1084__ I don't
want to go down that route again because we've, I think we've exhausted that
route R_____ But there's plenty of forensically admissible stuff about
1084__ Stella goes on to say that you began to send letters in 98 this is
approximately maybe one or two years after the letters started only when they
started in 96 so some time R_____ I doubt it was 96, 97 might have been
1084__ Sometime into the letters you began sending letters which imply that
Fian was your biological child which she knows is not true and you started
bombarding her R_____ Sorry who knows this not to be true 1084__ Stella
knows this is not true R_____ She was living with me, we were having sex
every night for the three months that cover the time gap that Fian was conceived
. Now I know she was having sex with other people but apart from anything
else, balance of probability, it would be that I would be the father 1084__
She said that you bombarded her and her family of letters about this and sent
birth certificates, medical information of blood grouping etc R_____ That's
right yes 1084__ In relation to those claims R_____ They're very precise
stuff yes 1084__ And that you've also written directly to Fian making no
secret that you believe that you're his father R_____ That's right yes
1084__ She says that in total you sent her and her family, literally hundreds
of unwanted, unanswered, letters over a period of approximately four years
R_____ 50, 50 I wouldn't dispute over three years 1084__ Most of the
letters have been destroyed however I do have a number of letters which I
produce which are here and also with , some of them with the envelopes. It's
also saying you also set up the web site which we've just discussed with your
story R_____ Which also has got the dyschondrosteosis stuff which is very
very helpful to five people around the world [ about 30 now in June
2001] 1084__ Which refers to her and discusses immoral and evil R_____ It
doesn't, it refers to someone called Sheila or something or other 385___ Who
is Sheila R_____ Just a person in my write-up 385___ But your write-up
is about Stella isn't it R_____ Write-ups about all sorts of things
385___ But you said earlier that you changed the names to ... R_____
Changed locations, I changed a lot of details you know 385___ But it ...
R_____ Because it's in the public domain, I didn't want to have to read up
about libel rules and that sort of thing 1084__ In your story the person
that you're referring to as Sheila is Stella R_____ Just someone called
Sheila 1084__ Do you know someone called Sheila then R_____ No it's a
write-up 1084__ So you're saying what's on the web site is fictitious
R_____ Yeah a lot of it is 1084__ And it doesn't make it, it doesn't
refer to Stella at all R_____ No no where in it 385___ Do any of the
stories relate to Stella that involve Sheila R_____ Oh bits of them
385___ And earlier you said you changed the names because you didn't want to
be sued for libel. If you just made it up you wouldn't need to change a name
would you R_____ Well make, change the name, make up names anyway 385___
Cos doesn't Stella receive some correspondence to Sheila, have you sent
anything to her about Sheila R_____ Not as far as I know. Unless I have got
an alternative personality and started doing that 1084__ She goes on to say
that she'd now like the police to intervene and she feels harassed and
distressed as a recipient of the unwanted and the unanswered letters and she
fears by your comments that you made in a letter dated 29th of March of this
year. Where you say, "I'll move onto the next irrevocable stage after April
30th, 2000 unless anyone comes up with any forensically admissible proof that
Kelvin and Fian are related". What did you mean by that comment R_____ Well
I started to go in the public domain I was trying to keep all this within the
family sort of thing 1084__ So what did you mean by move onto the next
irrevocable stage R_____ Well I assumed, it's the first time that I've ever
put anything like this on the Internet. That it might create a life of its own
sort of thing and be unstoppable, but I don't think it's the case though. It's
just ignored. 1084__ She saw that as being a threat to her, is that what it
was intending to be R_____ No I mean I never made any threats at all to her
385___ It's a veiled threat there isn't it R_____ No it's not a threat I
don't make threats. Stella is the one that makes threats and violence as well
1084__ She goes on to say that the stress that you've caused not only
affects her but the whole family, in particular her daughter Leafe who's your
daughter too R_____ I'm afraid so, that's the way it's ended up 1084__
But if you're causing this R_____ I'M NOT causing it, it's that, THAT woman
just lying about everything to everyone, it's just disgusting ... 385___ You
could be termed as what's called a nuisance really though couldn't you R_____
Yes, that's why she wants this whole business of a gagging order, to get rid of me
385___ Because you're a nuisance R_____ A thorn in her leg, right
385___ You harass her R_____ No I've not, I've not, I've not harassed her
. I've informed a number of her family, relatives, very precise
information, that's not harassment in my terms 1084__ If someone took that
course of action towards myself or anybody I knew I would call it harassment
R_____ Have you read the relevant act 385___ Yes 1084__ Yes
R_____ Section 2 385___ Section 1, subsection 2 R_____ The Man on the
Clapham Omnibus Test, what constitutes harassment 1084__ It's not actually
specified in the act what is and what is not harassment R_____ It does say
what constitutes harassment if someone independent knows what's going on.
1084__ It's not specified R_____ The test, the test for harassment is
someone independent watching what's going on, is in receipt of exactly the same
information whether they would find the conduct, if they would personally feel
harassed. I put this to all sorts of people, there's no threats in my
information 385___ Doesn't have to be a threat to be harassment does it
R_____ No the section 2 is it , the test for 385___ The person whose
conduct is questionable ought to know that it amounts to harassment with
another, if a reasonable person possessing the same information would think the
course of conduct would amount to harassment of the other. Well I like as a
reasonable person that you've harassed Stella and her family R_____ I've
shown some people these letters and they've been enthralled about it not anyone
anyone if receiving these letters would be harassed. 1084__ Ultimately Mr
NUTTEING she's made a complaint of harassment against you, she feels harassed and
distressed by your course of conduct towards, otherwise she wouldn't of come ...
R_____ Her, her family's actions towards her not mine 1084__ By your
course of conduct the letters now been sent to her family but they've come back
to her, which ultimately causes her more distress by the nature of where you've
sent them to. She's saying that course of conduct has caused her distress, hence
she's come to us , if it hadn't caused her distress she wouldn't have come to the
police and asked for this to be made in complaint to you, because she hasn't done
so for several years of having receiving these letters has she R_____ That's
as far as I know yes 1084__ So she's feeling distressed then R_____ She
she wants a gagging order that's what it is 1084__ That's not what she's
asking at all 385___ What do you mean by gagging order R_____ Well she
wants me to be put in a position where I'm not allowed to inform anyone about
anything 385___ She wants to be left in peace R_____ Well that's
EASY, just, just divulge the blood groups openly, exchange letters between GPs, that
is all that's required 1084__ But that's not going to happen is it R_____
No it's a ridiculous stalemate thing 1084__ She's saying R_____ All this
business. Wasted money on window 1084__ That your course of conduct has
caused her distress and you're saying ... R_____ No one came back to me
saying anything, it's only the last, what is it ... 1084__ That's because they
have chosen to ignore your letters and filed them in the bin, because they don't
want to be hearing from you and they certainly don't want to be receiving
hurtful comments about somebody they care about R_____ I certainly never got
any comments of any shape or form back that they found them
intrusive, offensive, anything nothing at all 1084__ That's because most of
the letters were destroyed 385___ But you didn't get any positive feedback
either did you, you just buried your head in the sand R_____ I-I
haven't buried my head in the sand 385___ And continued to send them
. You didn't get feedback positive or negative R_____ I mean I've physically
received this round robin and I can reasonably infer from that that they didn't
want these letters but up to that point I've heard nothing at all 385___
Yeah but you've got nothing to say they didn't want them, but you've got nothing
to say they did want them. So you just buried your head in the sand and
continued to send them 1084__ It's not like you know these people is it
R_____ You're giving the impression that I was bombarding every post or
something like that, certainly was just over three years, I don't know why she
says four years, maybe 97, 98, 99 yeah I would have said three years rather than
four 1084__ Ultimately Mr NUTTEING it's going to be up to the court to
decide what is and what isn't harassment and if she feels that she's been
distressed and harassed by your actions then it's going to be up to the court
not one person you've spoken to or even our opinion that counts. It's going to
be up to the court to decide whether they deem your course of conduct towards
her and her family and friends and employer as harassment R_____ Well it
wasn't intended as harassment. It was putting my case to people who could have
a bearing 1084__ Well I put it to you that it wasn't reasonable for you to
be writing to her neighbours, her employer R_____ The neighbours were a bit
different. I was basically trying to get something about where my daughter had
gone or anything 1084__ You're saying that, that the parts of your neighbours
and employer was unreasonable R_____ Sorry the parts 1084__ The letters
that you sent to her neighbours were an unreasonable part of your trying to
spread your R_____ No a reasonable part 1084__ You're saying it's
reasonable R_____ Yes I mean no one there was going to tell me anything.
For all I knew my daughter had emigrated. I had had absolutely no contact
whatsoever, but someone I helped out well 800 quid, 500 quid one time and 300
quid another time for paying her rent on her house and that sort of thing in
Leicester and about two weeks after that I get this letter from her saying I'm
lying and deluded and doesn't want anything more to do with me 1084__ I'm
just amazed that you think your course of conduct was reasonable R_____ It
is in those circumstances. Would you write to a close relative of yours
informing that they were lying and deluded 1084__ That's R_____ I think
that's highly justified 385___ I think there's, I think there's things in
your letters that you can't prove are true R_____ Yeah but not lies
necessarily are they 385___ But they're not the truth, you're making a lot of
supposition about Stella without medical experts actually physically examining
her you don't know. Because I could say the same about you R_____ Those
comments are referring to someone in a write-up it's not directly referring to
her 385___ But it was because you sent those letters ... R_____
Where, where in all those letters does it say that I've implied that Stella
CONSTANT has got psychiatric problems. 385___ You my not have said Stella
CONSTANT but in your thing on the internet R_____ That, that's a different
matter altogether 385___ Well, you've actually said, that copy
those, (incoherent) to Stella and other people or to her family so you must have
meant it to mean Stella , or why send it to their families R_____ There's a
lot of it in there relevant, but a lot disguised and umm 385___ But you've
already said that you believe that's the case that she is suffering from that
disorder R_____ I wouldn't be at all surprised I tell you 385___ It's
not the truth is it, because she's not been examined for R_____ I, I don't
know 385___ Pure speculation on your behalf R_____ I should hope someone
has. No, just as an ordinary concerned member of the public I mean this-when she
came round to me-that unannounced visit. She spent well over half an hour going
into great detail about this case she was investigating in Winterslow, involving
sexual molestation and all sorts of nasty goings-on. This was, as far as I knew,
actually current investigation, and there was me nothing to do with social work.
Prattling on about this, I've forgot what I've said, so why did I bring that up
1084__ Can we go back to this web-site that you set up. You agreed that you
sent copies to some of Stella's family and friends, is that correct R_____ A
printed version 1084__ If that's nothing to do with Stella why would you
send that to them R_____ Because it's got information relevant about all
sorts of stuff, I don't put in letters. I mean there's precise details of blood
groupings, its very difficult to get hold of that complete listing of what's
allowable and what's not allowed .. 1084__ If you're saying it's nothing to
do with Stella why send it to these people that are relations to Stella
R_____ Because there is a lot of information that is relevant, but until I
have a dialogue with them I can't say what applies to her and what doesn't apply
to her. 1084__ You're not answering the question now, I'm saying why have
you sent it to Stella's relatives if you're saying it's nothing to do with
Stella 385___ And you're saying the story's not based around Stella
R_____ Oh there's links in there but not word for word 385___ The people
who are reading those things straight away that Sheila is Stella because why
send it to them otherwise R_____ Because it's a large printed tract and I
don't mind writing long letters but 60K of writing is ... 1084__ You're
trying to make us believe that you were writing to Kelvin's family to try and
ascertain blood test-blood groupings and things like that as a genuine reason to
find out what Fian's blood group is etc, which I can, I can understand why ...
There's a logic for that. R_____ I expected them to come back if I was
totally on the wrong track. If Kelvin's brother was blood group "A" then I
expected them to come directly back to me saying "You're talking a loud of
rubbish" ... 1084__ I don't disagree with that, I don't disagree that I
understand the logic for that one. What I'm saying is if you're saying that
this document has got nothing to do with Stella why are you sending it to these
people. That just doesn't make sense, that is just clear harassment by sending
this document ... R_____ No it's, it's not even set in Salisbury, all the
names are different everything ... 385___ If it's all different why send to
the people that you've been sending letters to R_____ Because I've got the
general information in there, the dyschondrosteosis and stuff. It's genuine
information 385___ And all you've done is change the name and in fact most
of it relates to Stella R_____ There's all sorts of differences in there, to
disguise who was writing it as well 385___ So you didn't get sued R_____
Er? 385___ So that you didn't get sued by Stella R_____ Possibly, I
haven't looked into that and can't comment anything about that 1084__ Why
else would you change the names R_____ Oh it's a ripping good yarn if you
like, ideal for the internet, it's full of conspiracy theory 385___ You've
based it on a true story in your opinion haven't you R_____ There's elements
of it in there that are true yes 1084__ What did you hope to achieve by
sending that document to her family and friends R_____ It's a summary of, all
sorts of stuff 1084__ What did you hope to achieve R_____ Well on the
internet ****. Nothings coming back, information of any sort, I could under-, I
could understand people complaining about information overload or something-just
too much 1084__ But you weren't sending people e-mails were you. You were
sending people, a, you were copying a document which you put on * and sending it
in the post to them. What were you intending to achieve if it wasn't intending
to cause harassment, what was the intention R_____ It's all about information
. It's putting my case, that is just part of it. It's not particularly useful
because it's all disguised. The far more useful bit is-I don't think I've got a
copy here-but my actual [paternity] treatise, the first letter I sent to
Fian, with all the genetic information. There was about 12 points, but 9 of them
probably would be forensically admissible probably 1084__ I mean now you've
heard it from us that Fian won't entertain the idea of consenting to a blood
test so ... R_____ WHY, WHY NOT 1084__ The matter of this
being resolved R_____ I mean the Family Law Reform Act where a mother's
refusal to ... 385___ He (incoherent) the parentage R_____ ... go over
blood groups can be deemed I don't know what the term is 385___ If he's
quite happy with accepting that Kelvin's his father. that doesn't necessarily
have to be biological does it because he's brought him up from birth R_____
Yeah I think, it's not like he's been officially adopted 385___ Why can't you
leave him to get on with his life R_____ Until I, I know definitely for sure
385___ Because once he knows even if you are his father, he's not gonna want
to speak to you anyway R_____ Not now, because the mother's mangled things up
so much. Even my daughter's not gonna have any contact with me now 1084__
The family are in no doubt that KELVIN is the biological father of Fian ...
R_____ Any ... 1084__ Which you're disputing. Now that's not gonna
change as a result of our conversation here today, we need to be sure that your
course of conduct is gonna end, because they, we're telling you that Stella is
feeling harassed and distressed by you're course ... R_____ I can say. I
won't be sending any letters to these four named individuals here. I've got no
animosity to them, it's just it's the first communication I've had. 385___
Because she doesn't want anymore sent to her work either R_____ Well I
can't, I've not had a letter from ... 385___ What we're saying to you though
is that she believes that, that course of conduct by sending it to her work is
harassment. You've been informed of it now and if there's another letter you
will be brought back in here R_____ I can understand that 385___ Now
we've got to make it clear to you now. Because you know that all the letters
that you sent out were unwarranted and people don't want them R_____ I
dispute whether it comes under the harassment act but I can see your point
385___ What I'm saying is you must not send anymore to work R_____ But
my point was I was warned in May or June whenever it was not to send any letters
to someone who transpires to be the complainant and victim Stella CONSTANT which
I haven't done 385___ No but you've tried to be clever and go around that
and sending to neighbours because you know damn well ... R_____ That, That
was a lot earlier, that was 385___ But you know damn well by sending it to
her family that they're gonna bring it up with Stella so other than delivering
directly you've sent them to Stella R_____ I can't predict things like that
385___ You know, you've done that so Stella can come round and talk to you
about the bloke and sort that out, so you know the family are gonna talk to
Stella about it R_____ This has to be in writing. I mean it's pointless
talking to her or conversation on the phone, is absolutely pointless. I still
haven't had anything in writing 1084__ I've made reference to Stella's
statement which has listed the people that you've sent letters to and she's
explained that all the recipients of those letters do not want those letters
from you R_____ I've now heard this. 1084__ And they certainly do not
want any of those letters in the future R_____ I've now heard it, and I've
heard precise names 1084__ And she's, she's listed not only her employer, the
people that you have letters from, she's also listed under that, LEAFE, FIAN, her
husband KELVIN and other people R_____ So my next move is Strasbourg then
1084__ That's you're choice if that's what you want to do R_____ That's
HER choice. I mean it could have been settled three years ago, but, so now I've
got to go to Strasbourg, because you're telling me I'm not allowed to communicate
with my children 1084__ We're saying that the letters R_____ That's what
you're saying 1084__ The letters that have been sent are unwanted and they
do not want to have this harassing communication from you 385___ I think the
best way for you do it, is to go through a solicitor if you want access.
R_____ I can't afford a solicitor at all 385___ You go through the
proper way but at the moment Stella's doing more ... R_____ If I could have
afforded it that's what I should have done 20 years ago 385___ Yeah
R_____ Couldn't afford it then, can't afford it now 385___ I think we've
resolved the interview today R_____ It's ridiculous 1084__ Okay is there
anything else you wish to add R_____ Yeah I did, I did write down a few
points, just in case they didn't turn up. Yeah, I said I was incorrectly warned
by WPC VIVIENE 385___ I don't think you were incorrectly warned R_____
Yeah, but I was warned not to send letters to Stella CONSTANT, I hadn't 385___
Yeah which can be directly or indirectly 1084__ They can't possibly
R_____ Letters, letters to Stella CONSTANT, not ... 1084__ (incoherent)
that what she said because you said you didn't know who it was R_____ I'll
go through precisely what it was. I happened to be going home * 385___ You
actually said that she didn't give you a name so you R_____ It wasn't just
that I went home , dropping off stuff at home because ****, at the same time
there's two uniformed policemen outside talking to a neighbour about a car that
had been dumped outside for weeks. So I assumed it was about that. WPC VIVIAN
came up to me and said "Hello Mr NUTTEING I want to talk to you, any idea why I
want to talk to you?". "oh, well if you know my name then it's probably
something to do with a woman in Salisbury". She said "yes" and said "We've had
a complaint about you sending letters to this woman" she didn't say a name "and
I'm here to warn you that under" well she didn't say the section "under the 1997
Protection from Harassment Act if you do it again you're likely to be arrested"
but she just made reference to this one unnamed person 385___ Okay what's
your next point R_____ Yes I mean if you brought up about that recorded
delivery letter. That comes under Section 1, subsection 3c as being reasonable
in the circumstances to get notice to her before the end of August after which
her costs in the civil action would go up all the time. [The letter I was
arrested for sending] PAUSE. And in a general sense a lot of my activities are
covered by section 1, subsection 3a as a means for detecting a crime that is
perjury and conspiracy to commit perjury. [and defamement by Stella Constant
of myself to my daughter] 385___ But that's you're opinion isn't it
R______Yeap
Form 365 served Interview concluded
------ The following is the first 5 minutes 40 seconds missing from
the first tape transcribed by myself.
1084__ Have you ever been
interviewed on tape before. R_____ No 1084__ What happens is I put 2
tapes in that run at the same time they're not recording one after the other.
They both record at the same time. One of those will be completely sealed up
and if the case goes to court that is called the master copy and that can be
unsealed for proof of the interview. The second tape is given, its one I can
make use of, it's called a working copy. R_____ I don't get a copy so can
I use my own recorder. 1084__ Hang on a sec. You can't use your own
recorder but you can apply for a copy. R_____ A transcribed copy or a copy
of the tape 1084__ A copy of the tape. I will give you a form at the end of
the interview. I've already written it here. This is the tape number. If you
take this along to a solicitor they can arrange for you to have a copy of the
interview. If it goes to any more tapes I'll record their numbers too.
Alternatively you don't have to go to a solicitor you can write yourself and ask
for a copy. R_____ Is there a case number I can refer to. I've had trouble
with this before. 385___ There is a unique number. R_____ ok, right, ok
1084__ With these details you can get a copy of the tape if you so wish, ok.
Initially I have to go through a number of instructions and explanations. I
have to go through with you. I'll go through that then I will go through the
body of what we need to talk to you about OK R_____ Yes 1084__ This
interview is being tape recorded. It may be used in evidence if your case is
brought to court. At the conclusion of the interview I will give you a note of
explanation of what will happen to the tapes and your entitlement to the tapes.
I am WPC 1084 Nicki GRIFFIN currently stationed at Salisbury. This interview is being
conducted in an interview room at Salisbury police station. The date is
Saturday 9th of September 2000 and the time by the interview clock is 20. 11
hours. What is your full name R_____ Paul NUTTEING 1084__ And your date
of birth R_____ ---- 1084__ Also present are 385___ DC Sean
MEMORY, Salisbury CID [Probably Sean James MEMORY, 10 Manor Farm
Rd, Salisbury, born March 1969, Bromley ] here to assist my colleague with the
interview 1084__ Can you confirm there is no one else present R_____ Oh
yes that's correct 1084__ I must remind you that you have the right to free
and independent legal advice. You can speak to a solicitor in private at
any time of the day or night and this legal advice is free. You can speak to a
solicitor personally. If you don't want to speak to him personally you can
speak to him by telephone. Do you want to speak to a solicitor before the
interview continues. R_____ No 1084__ Would you like to tell me why you
don't want free legal advice, you're not obliged to give any reply. R_____
Nothing major has turned up as yet that I can see warrants a solicitor, nothing
unforeseen that is. 1084__ I understand that previously you asked for legal
advice but changed your mind. You'vee spoken to Inspector DIBBLE and told
him you no longer want legal advice because you've spoken to him on the
telephone. R_____ At this moment 1084__ And you want to proceed with
the interview and Inspector DIBBLE has given authority for the interview to go
ahead. Can you confirm that is correct R_____ That is correct 1084__ Is
that still the case R That's still the case yes 1084__ I'm now going to
caution you again as I did after you were interviewed. You do not have to say
anything but it may harm your defence if you don't mention in questioning
something that you later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in
evidence. Do you understand what that caution means. R_____ Yes 1084__
What's your understanding of what that means. R_____ I understand it but I
don't really understand why but I can understand remaining silent. 1084__
It's a bit more than that. I'll go through and explain it. It's very important
that you have a complete understanding of what that caution means. The first
part says you don't have to say anything which means you don't have to answer
any of the questions that I put to you. The middle section says that it may
harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something that you later
rely on in court. What that means is that if you say nothing now and the case
goes to court and you come up with some explanation as to why you've been
brought here then that can be used as evidence and the court can draw its own
conclusion as to why you failed to say anything here. Also if you say something
here this evening and if the case goes to court you then give a different answer
or a different reason then again that can be used in evidence and the court can
come to its own conclusion as to why you've changed your answer ok. And
anything you do say can be given in evidence. You have an understanding of what
the caution means now. R_____ Yes [ In all the 1 1/2 hours of this
interview , in my terms, I only made one mistake - one word I should not have
used. There were apparently 2 more occasions but these turned out to be
transcription errors discovered listening to the actual copy of the audio tape.
These errors have been corrected from the original transcript as supplied by the
CPS. It was probably more a case of the transcribing typist hearing what she
wanted to hear rather than deliberate falsification. Nevertheless all such
transcripts should not be taken on trust and should be compared with the
recording. Not something a solicitor is necessarily going to do so anyone else
in similar circumstances - make your own copy of these tapes. ]
A lot of the following witness statements contains what Howard
Carter, Egyptologist, referred to as spherical and in the plural but for legal
reasons I have to put in the public domain word-for-word exactly as it was
written.
Witness Statement for Wiltshire Constabulary Statement of Stella Maria
CONSTANT of Salisbury Occupation Social Worker
This statement
(consisting of 8 pages each signed by me) is true to the best of my knowledge
and belief and I make it knowing that, if it is tendered in evidence, I shall be
liable to prosecution if I have wilfully stated anything which I know to be
false or do not believe to be true
Signature S. M. CONSTANT Date 14. 4
. 00
I am the above named person and I live at the address overleaf [ 4
Nelson Rd, Salisbury ] with my husband Kelvin Derrick DAWSON, dob 26. 7. 54 and
two of my four children, twins _ and _ dob_ I met my husband in [th -struck out
and initialled SMC] 1971 whilst at school in Salisbury, Wiltshire. We had a
relationship for five years before we split up. And it was after we split up
that I met Paul NUTTEING (Aged 47 years). At the time I was at teacher training
college in Southampton and Paul had recently left university in Southampton. I
was living as a lodger in his house , in the Empress Road area of Southampton
(now demolished) [not true -converted to small business use]. Paul and I
had a relationship which started in about January 1976, I fell pregnant. The
pregnancy was unplanned and I did not feel that we were in a long standing
emotionally fulfilling relationship. We never even discussed marriage or
settling down as a family as we did not have that sort of relationship.
Whilst pregnant I moved out of PAUL's house and into lodgings in Denzil Road
[sic] , Southampton. On the 27. 11. 76 I gave birth to a baby daughter
Naomi Leafe-Marie DAWSON At this time I resumed my relationship
END OF
FRONT PAGE
with my (now) husband Kelvin DAWSON, and therefore decided to
put Naomi's name down on the birth certificate under DAWSON. Copy of the birth certificate of Naomi Leafe DAWSON
[
Hampshire CPS was well aware of this perjury long before Wiltshire CPS got
involved. Main text reads CHILD - Twenty seventh November 1976 General
Hospital, Southampton Name - Naomi Leafe-Marie DAWSON - Female Father -
Kelvin Derrick DAWSON, born Salisbury, Wiltshire, University Student Mother -
Stella Maria CONSTANT, born Swindon Wiltshire - not married Address - 5 Denzil
Avenue, Sothampton Signatures K.D. Dawson and S. M. Constant Date of
Registration - Twenty first December 1976 Date of certified copy - 16th
September 1996 ]
Kelvin agreed to bring Naomi up as his own and up until
the split we'd had a fulfilling relationship which I believed would be stable.
I believe I told Paul about my plans and he never objected or intervened.
He knew he was Naomi's biological father, however he never offered to pay
maintenance or offer any support. I occasionally saw Paul around and he'd
ask after Naomi (occasionally), but did not appear to want to be involved in our
lives. PAUL knew that I was seeing Kelvin again, and never expressed any
objections to Kelvin becoming a "father figure" to NAOMI. When NAOMI (who I
call by her middle name LEAFE) was about 6 months old , I had to move out of my
lodgings and had nowhere to do [sic]. PAUL offered to help out, therefore for a
few months LEAFE and I moved into PAUL's in the EMPRESS ROAD area of Southampton
. At that time, although Kelvin and I were a couple, I did re-kindle my
relationship with Paul, and we did occasionally have sex at that time. After
a few months Kelvin found us a property to rent in Winn Road, Southampton, which
we moved into in [about -struck out SMC] 1977. After moving out from Paul's
house, and moving in with Kelvin, I ceased to have any sort of relationship with
Paul. I would occasionally see him around town and we would chat politely and
we
END OF PAGE TWO
stayed on friendly terms, however we never had
a relationship again. Whilst Kelvin and I lived at Winn Road, our son Fian
Gerald DAWSON was born, on the 27. 10. 78. I am certain that Kelvin is Fian's
biological father , and this has never been questioned (until now) [sic -
brackets]. In September 1981 Kelvin and I married, and in 1988, Kelvin and I
moved back to Salisbury with LEAF[sic] and FIAN. In 1994 Kelvin and I had
two further children, twin _ _ and _ DAWSON Between 1981 and 1995, I had no
contact with PAUL, and he never made any attempt to contact us. I never
discouraged him from having any contact with LEAFE, however at that time I do not
believe he knew where we were living. He never made any legal representations
to have access to LEAFE, and I never made any representations to apply for
maintenance payments. I was under the impression he was more than happy to let
me bring up LEAFE without his input. Kelvin and I brought LEAFE up to
believe Kelvin was her natural Father however we never "deliberately lied", as
the matter was never questioned by LEAFE. In 1995 [a member of the family
-struck out SMC] LEAFE found out that Kelvin was not her biological Father, and
queried this with me. I gave LEAFE the "basic" details of her Father, Paul
NUTTEING and the reasons she was brought up as Kelvin's child. LEAFE accepted
this and made no mention of her intentions to contact him. I did not know
PAUL's address at this time as we had not kept in touch. In approximately
1996 while LEAFE was
END OF PAGE THREE
away studying at
University she traced her natural Father and made contact with him. (She did
not tell me about this at the time). Sometime in 1996, LEAFE telephoned
me, she was very upset and wanted my help. She told me that she'd been in
contact with PAUL, her biological Father, and that he had started to bombard her
with "OBSESSIVE LETTERS". LEAFE was upset as he was implying he knew things
about me, and making general hurtful comments. LEAFE showed me a pile of
letters that PAUL had sent her. The letters [were -struck out SMC] were
[generally -struck out SMC] manipulative and insinuated there were dark
secrets, possibly criminal secrets which related to her Mother and the rest of
her family. PAUL sent her approximately a hundred letters, most of which were
destroyed, however LEAFE has kept a shoe box full at home. The letters did not
contain any "actual" threats, however they were extremely distressing, as most of
the contents were fabricated and twisted versions of the truth. As a result
of these letters, LEAFE asked me intervene [sic], therefore I went to * and went
to speak to PAUL at his home address *****. I made a COMPASSIONATE Appeal to
him to try and handle his relationship with LEAFE on a more appropriate level.
PAUL was quite tearful and [have -struck out SMC] seemed to take on board what I
was saying. There was no aggression or confrontational aspect to the visit and
we chatted on friendly terms, updating each other on the missing years. He never
once made any reference to FIAN being his child. I left on good terms, but
made no
END OF PAGE FOUR
plans to see him again and did not
discourage him from seeing LEAFE. For approximately six months after this
visit, we heard nothing, and then all of a sudden, he started to bombard us with
letters. He sent letter [sic] to my husband Kelvin DAWSON, my son FIAN DAWSON, My
daughter LEAFE, Daughter [sic], my Mum, Honoria CONSTANT, My Mother-in-law Pauline
DAWSON, my sister and her husband Mr & Mrs R, another sister and her husband
Mr & Mrs E, my brother-in-law Andrew DAWSON, My neighbours Mr & Mrs C, and
another neighbour D and my place of work, Salisbury Social Services. The
content of the letters , (most of which I've seen) was general hurtful comments
and lies and distortions about me and my family. In one particular hurtful
letter, which he sent to my Mother and Sisters he enclosed a Newspaper clipping
which referred to my Father, [following -struck out SMC] referring to an
incident in SALISBURY seventeen years ago, this letter caused particular distress
as it raked up an unpleasant incident from our past. [Usefully confirming
the identity of the 1984 Middle Woodford incident] In other letters he
referred to me suffering from (MPD) multiple personality disorder, he's accused
me of trying to get someone to kill him, he talks about me being
evil, corrupt, illegal activities as well as being immoral. He also makes
reference to moving onto the next stage, after April 2000. He has enclosed
"information booklets" about me to most of my family, again, twisting the truth
out of all recognition to portray
END OF PAGE FIVE
me as an
immoral person. He also tells my children that I have a sinister influence over
them, because they won't co-operate with them[sic]. I have attempted to
make contact with PAUL, in respect of these letters, however he refuses to
acknowledge my telephone calls, and I have therefore only been able to leave
messages for him, asking him to refrain from sending letters. In response
to this he sent my family further letters saying I'd been abusive and
threatening to him. In 1998 PAUL began to send letters which implied my son
FIAN was his biological child which I know is not true. He has bombarded me and
my family with letters and [photo -struck out SMC] photocopies of birth
certificates/medical information on blood grouping etc in relation to his claims
. He has also written directly to my son FIAN, making no secret that he believes
he his Father. He has spoken to FIAN on the telephone and FIAN has made
it quite clear to him that he doesn't want anything to do with him. In
total PAUL must have sent me and my family, literally hundreds of
unwanted, unanswered letters, over a period of approximately four years. Most of
the letters have been destroyed, however I do have a number of letters which I
produce as exhibit SMC1, many of which are signed by him. He has also set up
a web-site www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing.txt [ actually now
www.nutteing2.freeservers.com/nutteing.htm ] on which he has written "his story"
END OF PAGE SIX
much of which refers to me and my immoral and
evil behaviour and mental health problems. In addition to this I have
received silent phone calls which coincide with a letter being sent. The
caller withholds their number and never speaks, leaving it a couple of seconds
before hanging up. I suspect PAUL is responsible for making the calls. Up
until now we have tried our best to ignore the situation, approximately 2 years
ago we tried to report the concerns however it was explained that the law did
not cater for such problems, due to the lack of physical threats. I would
now like the police to intervene as we have suffered 4 years of harassment and
distress, as the recipient of many unwanted and unanswered letters. Over the
years the letters have become more and more irrational and I'm worried that
because he has become increasingly obsessive and irrational, I fear what he means
by his comments in his letter dated 29/3/00 where he says "I will move onto the
next irrevocable stage after April, 30, 2000 unless anyone can come up with any
forensically admissible proof that Kelvin and Fian are related". I do not
know if he suffers from any form of mental illness however the contents and
quantity of the letters leads me to feel that he "may" suffer mental health
problems, which again leads me to fear what he might do next. At present I
work as a social worker
END OF PAGE SEVEN
for Salisbury social
services, and my boss at work has received literature from PAUL accusing me of
"illegal and immoral activities" which has caused me a great deal of stress and
upset at work as well as at home. The distress PAUL has caused, not only
affects me, but the whole of my family, and in particular my daughter LEAFE, and I
believe that he is attempting to cause problems and distress between he[sic] and
my family and in particular my husband. signed S M Constant
Witness Statement of Stella Maria CONSTANT on 22 August, 2000 Further to
my previous statement made on the 14th April 2000 I wish to add that I have been
further harassed by Paul NUTTEING. In my previous statement I explained how
I have been bombarded with letters from Mr NUTTEING, the letters being sent to my
family, friends, employers, contain offensive remarks about myself which [ultimato
-struck out SMC] ultimately causes me to be distressed. At the time of
making the statement I requested the police visit Mr NUTTEING and "advise" him
to cease his harrassment[sic] of me. I understand that Mr NUTTEING was advised
about his course of conduct some time in May 2000. At the end of May 2000, I
cannot recall the exact date, I visited * , to visit a friend and whilst out for a
drink bumped into Mr NUTTEING. I tried to speak with him , however he refused to
talk to me, so I followed him to his home address [admission of stalking in her
own police statement] in an attempt to ask him personally to refrain from
harassing me. However in an attempt to raise him, banging on the window of ***, I
accidentely broke a piece of glass at the * of the premises. This matter has
been dealt with by * Police. However since this incident I have received
further [sic] letter causing me harrassment[sic].
[Note
there is a page break here and the narrative is discontinuous although the next
page is marked page 2 the first page, in the section marked "consisting of pages"
, there is the number 5 which has been struck out un-initialled and marked 2 pages
of statement. Someone might miscount 6 pages as 5 but no one miscounts 2 pages
as 5. This will have to be investigated using ESDA (Electro-Static Document
Analysis) on the originals to establish sequencing]
Following the
unfortunate incident involving the window, I voluntarily agreed to pay for the
damage, which I am sorting out through my solicitor. On the 9th August
2000, I received a letter from Mr NUTTEING, sent by recorded delivery. This
letter caused me to be upset as it infers that I am "stalking" him. A copy of
this letter has also been sent to my husband, Kelvin DAWSON, my brother-in-law
Andrew DAWSON as well as my boss John STODDART at Salisbury Social Services.
I produce the letter and envelope [2 words "and envelope"caretted and not
initialled], dated 9/8/00 as exhibit S. M. C. 2. On the 15th August 2000, my
husband received a further letter, and computer printout from Mr NUTTEING, again
causing me distress. I produce this letter as exhibit S. M. C. 3. This on
going harrassment[sic] is causing me a great deal of anxiety and distress, and I
now feel that as he has refused to heed the advice[sic] given to him by * police
that I would like to pursue a criminal complaint of harrassment[sic] against
Paul NUTTEING. signed S M Constant
Witness Statement of Kelvin Derrick DAWSON, civil servant, of Salisbury Date
29/9/00 I am the above named person and I reside at the address overleaf [ 4
Nelson Rd , Salisbury ] with my wife Stella CONSTANT, and our two youngest
children, twin _ _ and _ DAWSON. We have two other children [Lea -struck out
initialled D] Naomi Leafe DAWSON born 27/11/76 and Fian Gerald DAWSON born
27/10/78, who no longer live at home. In approximately 1975, while I was a
student in Southampton I met Paul NUTTEING who I met as a result of my social
circle. I would not describe him as a friend of mine, merely someone I knew to
speak with. At that time I was having a relationship with Stella CONSTANT who
is now my wife. Stella and I split up, and I became aware that Stella was
seeing Paul NUTTEING. I wished to re-kindle our relationship and I believe at
about that time Stella was seeing both Paul and I. In approximately Spring
1976 Stella told me she was pregnant. At that time we'd drifted back together
and were living in a bed-sit. I recall us being unsure of Leafe's paternity,
however, we hoped the baby was mine and decided to treat the baby as mine and
became a family. At the time Paul NUTTEING knew about Stella's pregnancy
and never once indicated that he believed he "could" be Leafe's father, so we
never pursued this with him. On the 27/11/76 Leafe was born, and I was
present at the birth. The three of us lived together as a family while Leafe
was a baby however we were struggling financially as I was studying for my
finals and was trying to provide for us. I recall when Leafe was a small
baby, Stella moved out, and so she had no where else to go stayed with Paul
NUTTEING. Leafe was approximately 7-8 months old (in 1977). In June 1977 I
sat my finals and started looking for a job and a flat. In the autumn of that
year Stella and I got back together again, and moved in together into a new flat
. I recall we spent that Christmas together and as a couple we were "settling
down". In the spring of 1978 Stella told me she was pregnant. I recall at
that time there was no doubt in our minds that the baby was mine. We were
together, and settled in a loving relationship at the time the baby (Fian) was
conceived. On the 27/10/78 Fian was born, and I was again present at the
birth. Stella and I lived together with the children. We very occasionally saw
Paul NUTTEING, however on the occasions we did see him he never made any comments
whatsoever that he was either of the children's father. Stella and I
married on the 2?/9/80, and after moving to Winchester, settled in Salisbury in
Wiltshire. I [sic] approximately 1996, I was working away quite a lot, and
when I came back from the Falklands I discovered Leafe was very distressed about
the contact she'd initiated with Paul NUTTEING. Because we never knew, 100
per cent who was Leafe's father we never discussed her paternity with her and
when she found out about Paul NUTTEING she [had -struck out D] contacted him.
By the time I found out about this, Paul NUTTEING had already started to send her
dozens and dozens of letters. Leafe became distressed at the gravity[unclear]
and content of the letters and couldn't "cope" with the situation and became
extremely distressed. I recall some of the letters were distastefully explicit
about Stella's promiscuity, and about her relationship with him. I was appalled
by the way he had handled the situation with Leafe however at that time Stella
tried to deal with the situation on her own. I knew Stella went to visit
Paul in *, at that time and tried to reason with him. After becoming so
distressed, Leafe ceased contact with Paul, who by now was accepted as probably
her father. She was so determined to cease contact that she moved house and did
not give Paul her forwarding address, and expressed to the rest of the family
that she didn't want anything else to do with him. I believe Leafe kept
most of the letters, however I recall we[maybe she] destroyed the most upsetting
of the letters. The letters then ceased for a while. And then Paul
NUTTEING started to write letters to my mother and Stella's mother. Then my
brother Andrew DAWSON got a letter, and eventually one by one the letters got
back to us. All the letters had an underlying bitterness, and made unpleasant
comments about Stella and her promiscuity in her youth. The letters were often
cryptic, i.e. he would send a birth certificate and imply from his letter that the
recipient should delve{unclear] deeper into the contents of the letter. I
contacted Salisbury Police, however I was advised that, at that time there was
nothing they could do, and they advised us to ignore the letters. The
letters continued and we destroyed most of them straight away. After a
while the contents of the letters suddenly started to talk about Fian, and how he
believed he was Fian's father. We couldn't understand this, so we just continued
to ignore them. I personally received approximately four letters, Stella
received approximately six letters, Fian received approximately six letters, and
Leafe received several dozen in total. I do not know how many letters he
sent to the rest of my family, however I do know the family felt distressed by
the gravity[?] and contents of the letter[sic]. He also sent letters to our
neighbours and to Stella's employers at Salisbury Social Services. The
whole episode was extremely upsetting, and Paul seemed determined to "embarrass"
Stella to as many of her family and friends he could contact. We continued
with our stance to ignore the letters, as the police advised us however he
continued to try and provoke a response from us by the unpleasant contents of
some of the letters. I know on a couple of occasions Stella telephoned
him, pleading with him to cease the harrassment[sic] but that just provoked more
letters. He also published a "story" on the internet, detailing the events of
Stella's life when he knew her in Southampton. He changed the names , however it
was obvious to everyone who read it who the characters were. He sent this
information to our neighbours, our family and to Stella's employer. The
letters caused increasing distress to us as a family, and in particular to Leafe
and Fian, and we now feel that we want the harrassment[sic] to stop. In May
2000, Stella and I discussed reporting the incident to the police as she felt so
distressed about how the constant bombardment of letters to friends and family
that we decided to report the harrassment[sic] to Salisbury Police asking for
Paul to be advised. However despite this advice the letters have continued
and we would now like to proceed with a formal complaint of harrassment[sic]
against Paul NUTTEING. I personally feel harrassed[sic] by Mr NUTTEINGs
actions and can verify as to the upset he's caused the rest of my family.
signed K D Dawson
Witness Statement of John Barton STODDART [ 1 Shaftsbury Rd, Barford St.
Martin, Wilts ], area manager, social services Date 3/10/00 I am the above
named person and I currently work as area manager at Social Services in
Salisbury. One of my employees at Salisbury Social Services is Stella
CONSTANT. Stella has been a social worker at Salisbury for eleven years.
In April 2000, a letter, post marked the 11/4/00 arrived at Salisbury District
Council. Inside the hand-written envelope was a piece of paper stating
"www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing.txt has the illegal and immoral activities of
one of your staff called stella[sic]". The letter was wrongly addressed and
was therefore sent to County Hall, who established the only employee we have
called "Stella", is Stella CONSTANT and forwarded the letter to myself at
Salisbury. I was alarmed by the note and felt I had a duty to investigate
the allegations further, and therefore printed off the details off of the
internet web-site and read them. I read the web-site in company with Stella's
immediate supervisor John Pook. [ This is probably John POOK, 36 Hulse
Rd, Salisbury, born 1951 Salisbury, married a Jean E. Gardner, Salisbury, 1977 ;
probably died 31st Oct 2004 ]
John informed me that he was aware that Stella was being harrassed[sic] by a
man in *. It was therefore obvious to us that the false name given on the
web-site did in fact refer to Stella CONSTANT. I received the letter on the
13/4/00, and the following day I spoke with Stella about the letter. Stella
was extremely angry and distressed that the letter had been sent to her employer
. As a social worker, working with children and families, such comments about
"illegal and immoral activities", is very worrying, and potentially damaging to her
career. Stella explained to me that she was being harrassed[sic] by a man
from * called Paul NUTTEING, she told me that she had had a relationship with
him a long time ago and that he had been harrassing[sic] her for some time. She
told me that she had previously spoken to her immediate supervisor John Pook
about the harrassment[sic], I therefore accepted that the allegations were
unfounded, and for this reason I did not reply to the initial letter, as I did not
wish to encourage him. On the 30th May 2000 a second letter arrived. This
time the letter was sent to our Adult Care Department by mistake prior to
arriving at our office. The recipient at the adult care team L. M.
, write a letter of acknowledgement to Mr NUTTEING stating she had now forwarded
the letter to myself at Salisbury Social Services. I produce the
acknowledgement letter as exhibit JBS2. The content of the letter again
related to Stella and referred to her relationship with Paul NUTTEING. The
letter made reference to her son and genetic testing. I did not keep a copy of
this letter. I again raised this issue with Stella, and gave her the letter
to use if she wished to pursue a complaint of harrassment[sic] with the
police, or to destroy if she wished. I again accepted that she was being
harrassed[sic] and took no action as far as her work was concerned. On the
9th Aug 2000, we received a further letter at our office from Paul NUTTEING.
Enclosed inside the envelope was a typed sheet entitled "Update as of 21 May
2000". And three hand-written letters dated 9/8/00 I produce [a -struck out
uninitialled] these letters as exhibit JBS3. I found these letters extremely
unpleasant, and the content , and tone of the letters extremely worrying, and felt
quite concerned about Stella's welfare. I again spoke to Stella about the
letters and she informed me that copies of the letters had already been sent to
other members of her family and she had already read them. Stella was extremely
distressed and clearly felt harrassed[sic] by Mr NUTTEINGs course of conduct
directed at her. On the 15th August, a further letter dated
15/8/00, arrived, again hand-written and directed to me. This letter [? struck out
uninitialled] again referred to Stella and an incident involving a broken window
in *. I produce this letter as exhibit JBS4. I produce the initial
letter sent dated 11/4/00 as exhibit JBS1 [This letter JBS1 is a forgery, it
is not one of my letters] One of the most distressing aspects of this
upsetting correspondence is that the letters have been wrongly addressed and
therefore have been unnecessarily circulated to other members of staff. I
believe that the fact these letters [co-??? -struck out initialled JBS] have
been sent to her employer is extremely unnecessary, and I do not welcome private
correspondence about my staff. The whole incident has clearly affected
Stella, who is a particularly[unclear] private member of staff and I have no
doubt that she feels her career has been affected by these allegations made
against her by Mr NUTTEING. signed John B. Stoddart
Witness Statement of Fian Gerald DAWSON, student, Exeter Dated 4/11/00 [
As a point of general interest there are just 4 people in England, Wales and
Scotland with Fian as their first name despite it being an oriental first name
also .] I am the above named person and I reside at the address overleaf.
I was born on the 27th October 1978 in Southampton and my parents are Stella
Maria CONSTANT and Kelvin Derrick DAWSON. I have one sister Naomi Leafe DAWSON
(23 years old) and twin _ _ and _ DAWSON _ years. The family reside in
Salisbury. I recall that some time in 1997, when I would have been 18-19
years old, I became cross with my parents for always opening my mail. They gave
their excuses but this did annoy me at the time. In February 1998 my
sister, who the family call "Leafe", sat me down on my own one day, and informed me
that she was in fact my "half sister", and her father was a man from * called
Paul NUTTEING Leafe told me that he'd bombarded her with dozens of letters, and
she had ceased contact with him because from the letters he appeared to have an
unstable[unclear] personality and had started to write unpleasant venomous
comments about our mother Stella CONSTANT. Leafe explained that the reason
my parents were opening my post was because Paul NUTTEING was trying to contact
me, claiming "he" was my father. Leafe told me that because I was sitting my
"A" levels at the time and planning a trip to India, they believed it was in my
best interest to protect me from any contact with Paul NUTTEING. I
wholeheartedly agreed with this decision. During my conversation Leafe
showed me a pile of letters that Paul NUTTEING had sent to her, and I read some
of the letters. In particular I recall reading excerpts which referred to me.
I found the content of the letters very distressing as they contained
references to our mother and talked about her life at university in Southampton
. After our long chat, I then went and spoke to my parents Stella CONSTANT
and Kelvin DAWSON. My parents assured me that they felt sure I was their
biological son, and agreed that now I was fully aware of the situation I should
deal with the letters [? -struck out FGD] myself. My parents stated that they
would support my decisions about Paul NUTTEING, whatever they were, and would
support me if I wished to reply to any of his letters, or meet Paul NUTTEING.
Having now read a quantity of the letters, and spoken to my family, I made the
decision that I had no intention of replying to any of the letters, or meeting
Paul NUTTEING to discuss his claims of paternity. After this conversation I
went to India for six months, and then a month after I returned went off to
university. I did not receive any mail while I was travelling, however on my
return my parents gave me some letters sent to me by Paul NUTTEING. Most of
the letters were briefly read, and then ripped up by me. I found the content and
unpleasant comments about my mother upsetting and had no intention of replying
to any of the letters. I believe I received approximately ten letters. On
one occasion I received a "coded" letter, where Paul NUTTEING he[unclear] was
moving on to the next phase and "going public". I found this letter quite
disturbing so I decided to telephone him and for once "air my views" not his.
[transcript of this call at end of the file]. I was quite reasonable with
him on the telephone, explaining that I didn't want any contact with him, and I
did not appreciate him sending so many letters. I informed him I was now an
adult and my paternity was my business not his. I believed my parents when they
told me I was their son, and I accepted[unclear] that I told him under no
circumstances {? -struck out FGD] would taking a "blood test" to positively
prove my paternity would change the fact. I wanted nothing to do with someone
who had caused so much distress to my family. After airing my views to
Paul NUTTEING on the telephone and informing him I did not want any contact with
him, he continued to write me letters. I found this quite distressing as I
believed any reasonable person would respect my wishes and leave our family in
peace. He appeared to have an "obsessive" personality, and continued to
persist in bombarding me and my family with letters. I know he sent letters to
my extended family and also to my neighbours. This really upset us as a
family particularly my mother. We supported each other as a family through this
distressing time just hoping he would leave us all alone. Whilst living
away at university I was informed that Paul NUTTEING was trying to find "where"
I was staying at university. I believe one letter sent to my parents had my "A"
level results in it, and made reference to me doing a law degree. None of this
information should have been known to him. There was also a reference to him
trying to trace me at the "wrong" university and getting into an argument with
someone about where I was studying. [I had caught out Professor C. G. J
Morse, Head of the School of Law, King's College London. In written
"cross-examination" of him he had stated the Cable and Wireless phone system in
their college could not extract the CLI (1471) line identification off my phone
line. Also how did Fian Dawson know about this particular business I had never
said anything to any of the Dawson / Constant clan about this business. ] As
a result of this I feared he might try and trace me so my credit cards etc, I
therefore had to have all my post sent to my parents house in Salisbury which
was really inconvenient , and I had to be guarded about "who" I gave my
university address to. In total I believe from the time I discovered Paul
NUTTEING was trying to contact me, I have received approximately ten
unwanted, unsolicited letters. I always informed my parents if I received a
letter from Paul NUTTEING, so withholding the unpleasant comments about my mother
suffering from a "multiple personality disorder", being an "evil bitch" and doubt
over paternity claims etc always got back to my mother causing her more distress
. I personally find it unbelievable that one person can cause a family so
much upset and distress, and I was keen for my parents to involve the police at
an early stage of the harrassment[sic] however my mother is a very forgiving
character and did not want to upset him by having him pressured however my
family now feel unless formal actions[sic] is taken against Paul NUTTEING he
will never stop harrassing[sic] us as a family and in particular my mother
Stella CONSTANT. I have not "personally" kept any of the letters sent to me
. The letters sent to me were either destroyed or retained by my parents.
signed F G Dawson
Witness Statement by Naomi Leafe Marie DAWSON , letting manager, London [also
uses the Naomi CONSTANT ] Date of Statement 4/11/00 I am Naomi Leafe Marie
DAWSON and was born on the 27th November 1976, in Southampton. At the time
that I was born my mother Stella Maria CONSTANT was having an on/off
relationship with my "dad" Kelvin DAWSON and my biological father Paul
NUTTEING, and after I was born my mother and Kelvin DAWSON brought me up, and as a
child I had no idea there was any doubts in my ancestry. I [? -struck
out, initialled ND] recall when I was eighteen years old I got into an argument
with my dad, Kelvin DAWSON. I was being a "normal" stroppy teenager and making
general heated comments during the argument. My mum assumed from things I'd
mentioned that I knew that Kelvin wasn't my biological father, but this was not
the case. Therefore after the argument mum made a comment about Kelvin not
being my natural[sic]. I was really shocked as I had no idea. I recall walking
out of the house, and trying to work out in my head what she was telling me.
Mum was very upset at the time and told me that whilst a student in
Southampton she was having an on/off relationship with both Paul NUTTEING and
Kelvin DAWSON. She told me she fell pregnant in an unplanned situation and
believed Paul was the biological father. She told me after falling pregnant she
realised it was Kelvin who she loved and they chose to bring me up, treating
Kelvin as my father. I was really confused and upset, and on the one hand I
wanted to meet him and get in contact , and on the other hand I didn't want to
upset my parents. I have a very good relationship with my parents, and we've
always been close as a family. Kelvin never treated me any different to my
siblings and often quite the contrary and I often felt I was favourite. On
my return from "storming out" I saw my mum hang up the telephone, I was
suspicious because it was late. After she'd left the room I [did -struck out
ND] dialled[caretted] 1471 and noted the number had a _ code. I suspected my
mum had been speaking to Paul. I looked in my mum's telephone book and noted
down Paul's telephone number - I never told mum or dad that I had done this.
[The above is a load of tosh, surprisingly, her mother's statement about "at
that time I do not believe he knew where we were living" is the true version. I
first knew of their address 22 Oct 1996, their telephone number 5 Nov 1996 and
the first contact of Leafe to myself on 8 Sep 1996, not Easter as stated in the
following. Somewhere in this fabrication and all their statements is a
deliberate disguise about "Michael" being Leafe's informant about me] I don't
recall discussing any "contact" with Paul at this time, [? -struck out ND]
however both mum and dad we, re being very supportive and I didn't feel under any
pressure not to contact him, I just didn't want to upset their
feelings, particularly my dads. I recall going back to university after this
"bombshell" had been dropped couldn't stop thinking about my biological
father, and curiosity got the better of me. I returned home to my parents in
Salisbury for the [summer -struck out ND] Easter holidays and it was at this
time I plucked up the courage to ring Paul NUTTEING for the first time. I
called him and told him who I was, and he "hung-up". I called back and again
said who I was, and he said he'd been expecting me to call. He sounded very nice
and we chatted and exchanged telephone numbers and addresses. I decided not to
tell my parents about contacting Paul as I didn't want to upset them. Paul
and I began to correspond, and all the letters were pleasant and informative, so
we were both keen to find out information about each other. I wrote to Paul on
about two or three occasions but generally contacted him by telephone speaking
approximately twice a week initially. I continued to receive lots of
letters and at first I was pleased Paul was taking an interest in me, however as
time went on the letters became more and more ?[unclear] to the point that I was
receiving letters every day sometimes 2 or 3 letters in one day. The letters
became "rambling" and started to include references to his relationship, sexually
with mum and started to include unpleasant references to my mum. I felt he was
trying to turn me against her. The letters were all hand-written and posted
direct to me. A few weeks after we'd started our contact, I phoned him and
arranged to meet him in *. I still hadn't informed my family, so they had
no idea what was going on. I met him, we chatted and he drove me home to his
house. I was really shocked by what I saw. He appeared to be living a very
"insular" existence in a tumble down house, * * *. His appearance was
dishevilled, with scruffy clothes and * *. I immediately felt sorry for him, and
my feelings towards him were more of pity than anything else. After the
meeting, the letters continued until I felt I couldn't cope with the
gravity[unclear] and contents, as they seemed to be becoming more "disturbed". I
confided with a close friend at university, and asked her to read the letters
which she did. She immediately told me I must tell my parents as the situation
was too much for me to cope with alone. I telephone my mum, I was extremely
distressed and told her everything, and how I couldn't cope with the letters he
was writing to me. Mum was great, she wasn't at all cross with me and was very
supportive. Mum offered to go and speak with Paul on my behalf and try to ask
him to [be m -struck out ND ] behave more appropriately towards me. I believe
mum visited him in * and he seemed to take on board what mum had said to him.
On my next visit home from university I brought the letters back and showed
them to my mum. The letters however continued and out of the blue he suddenly
started to refer to Fian and claiming he was Fian's father. I ?[unclear] mum
again and she said this was not the case but he started to become obsessive
about Fian and wrote me a number of letters claiming paternity. He was
always telling me, that he was "saving everybody", and wanted "the truth" to be
made public. He became more and more unpleasant and I really became quite
distressed by the content of the letters. On numerous occasions I pleaded
with Paul not to "tell" everyone about him being my father as I felt it was a
private matter between him and me, and didn't want everyone in particular my
extended family to know. He always seemed to have a plausible explanation for
"telling" and "saving" everybody, but he didn't seem to care how much this would
upset me. I soon became aware of his motives, to cause as much distress to my
mother as he possibly could. At this time my brother Fian was totally
unaware of anything to do with Paul NUTTEING and never even knew of his
existence. We had decided to protect Fian from what was going on, however as
the letters continued, I decided I should tell Fian the truth. I told Fian
everything in 1998 before he went off to India. He appeared quite calm and
seemed to take it all in. I can't remember discussing any contact with
Paul, other than I advised him how he'd behaved towards me and wanted him to be
cautious. Fian made no comments to me about my advice to contact Paul. My
parents were aware of all that I'd told Fian, and again were very supportive to
us. When I was about twenty years old, I decided I didn't want any further
contact with Paul as I found his obsessive behaviour towards me and my family
too distressing. I told him I didn't want any further contact with him and
moved away giving him no idea where I was going to live. I made sure I
couldn't be traced and made sure I wasn't on the electoral role[sic].
Fortunately Paul never managed to trace me. However I did still received[sic]
some letters at my parents home in Salisbury. I find it quite disgusting at
the lengths he seems to go to track me down, writing to every hotel in
Leicester to find where I was working and finding out my "credit
history" to try to locate me. I feel that if there is no formal
proceedings ordering Paul NUTTEING to stop harrassing[sic] me and my
family the harrassment[sic] will continue indefinitely. I do not want any
further contact with Paul, and I feel his behaviour towards me was totally
inappropriate. After ceasing all contact with Paul, in 1998, Paul started to
bombard my family with letters. He decided against my wishes to tell everyone
about my paternity and wrote letters to my family, my extended
family, neighbours, mum's friends and her place of employment. My mum also told
me Paul had set up an internet web-site. I did not see the letters sent, but I
did discuss them with my mum and she was very distressed by the whole episode.
My mum is a very quiet natured woman, and I know that the unwanted letters
which were filtering back to her were causing her a great deal of
harrassmnt[sic] and distress. I have kept most of the letters, some of which
I threw away and destroyed. The letters I kept dated from 1996 to 1998, all
hand-written by Paul NUTTEING I produce as exhibit NLMD1. signed N L Dawson
Witness Statement by Honoria Eileen CONSTANT, retired Date 30/9/00 I am
the above named person and I reside at the address overleaf [ Mrs H E Constant
of 6 Elliot Green, Winterbourne Gunner, Wilts]. I have four daughters , Stella
CONSTANT, A. W , N. E, and G. R.
[ Two of these anonymised three could have joined in the conspiracy as
they received the same letter from me. I will give them the benefit of the
doubt and say they were honourable no to. In acknowledgement of this I
am honourable enough not to print their names here. There were not blacked out
in the witness statement of Mrs H E Constant ]
My eldest daughter Stella has four children
, Leafe, Fian, _ and _. Stella lives with her husband Kelvin in Salisbury.
Approximately three or four years ago I cannot recall the exact [? -struck
out HEC] date I received a hand-written letter from "Paul NUTTEING". I had no
idea who this man was but it was clear from the content of the letter that he
referred to Stella's past and I found the unpleasant contents very upsetting. I
ripped up the letter and put it in the bin without mentioning anything to Stella
. After I'd received this letter, I received a telephone call from Stella
asking if I'd received any strange letters. I told her I had and had ripped it
up. She told me other letters had been circulated about her. After this
first letter, I remember a further six or seven, hand-written letters all
personally addressed to me. All written by one Paul NUTTEING. To my knowledge
I have never met the man and he has no reason to contact me or have my address.
On receipt of the additional letters I immediately recognised the
handwriting and as I did not wish to be upset again by the contents I put the
letters straight onto the fire without reading them. On a few of the
occasions I received letters I told Stella that I'd received them. Stella
was extremely upset about all the letters being circulated about her, and we all
felt as a family very harrassed[sic] by this man who persisted in his letter
writing. I did not reply to any of the letters, as I did not know this man
and did not wish to correspond with someone who had caused so much upset to our
family. All the letters were unwanted, and I believe that the only
intentions he could have had , were to upset us all as a family and in particular
Stella. I received the most recent letter some time earlier this year.
signed H. E. Constant
Witness statement of Pauline DAWSON, retired Date 30/9/00 I am the above
named person and I reside at the address overleaf [ , Mrs P Dawson of 7 Maple
Croft, Ridings Mead, Salisbury ]. I have two sons, Kelvin DAWSON and Andrew
DAWSON who both reside in Salisbury. Kelvin is married to Stella CONSTANT
and they have four children Leafe, Fian, _ and _. Approximately two to three
years ago I received a hand-written letter from "Paul NUTTEING". I have no idea
who this man is and I've never met him before. I read the letter and found the
contents very upsetting. The letter referred to Stella's past and I was quite
disgusted about the lies he was saying about Stella. I decided not to tell
Stella or Kelvin about the letter and put it away in a drawer. Kelvin
telephoned me after I'd received the letter and asked me if I'd received any
"unusual letters". I said I had and gave him the letter. I then received a
further two or three letters, again which I read and I again found the contents
extremely distressing. I know that the circulation of these letters about
Stella, have caused her and her family a great deal of distress. The whole
family feel hrrassed[sic] by his persistent letter writing, and I personally feel
in fear as a result of his actions. All the letters were unwanted, and I
never replied to any of the letters as I did not wish to correspond with this
man who had caused our family so much upset. I have never given this man my
address, and I do not[caretted and initialled PD] wish to have any contact with
this man. The most recent letter from Mr NUTTEING, was a post card which
arrived during the summer of 2000. signed P. Dawson
Witness Statement of Andrew David DAWSON, retail manager Dated 30/9/00 I
am the above named person and I reside at the address overleaf [ Mr A Dawson of
21 Wordsworth Rd, Salisbury ]. I had one brother, Kelvin Derrick DAWSON, who
also resides in Salisbury. Kelvin is married to Stella CONSTANT, and they have
four children, Leafe, Fian, _ and _. Approximately two, to two and a half years
ago, in approximately 1997-1998, I received a hand written letter from a man
called "Paul NUTTEING". I read the letter and immediately realised the letter
concerned my sister in law Stella CONSTANT. The content was quite
disturbing, and I immediately contacted my brother Kelvin and gave him the
letters[sic]. I have never met Paul NUTTEING. I have never given him my
address and he had no reason whatsoever to write to me. In total I received
approximately six or seven letters, all personally addressed to me, and all with
similar upsetting contents. I always informed my brother of the letters and
always gave them to him. I know that Stella was very distressed by the fact
letters were being circulated about her, and the whole episode has caused the
whole family a lot of upset. I did not reply to any of the letters, as I did
not even know who this man was, and had no intentions of being involved. Kelvin
advised me at some point to ignore the letters and destroyed them. On one
occasion I received a typed booklet. The story in the booklet gave false names
however it was clear to anyone who knows Stella that the story referred to her.
On another occasion I received coloured photographs of Stella with with[sic]
the[caretted -un-initialled] man. I found this letter the most upsetting.
[This is the photo reproduced below showing myself with SM Constant and her
daughter taken on 04 June 1978. No wonder he found it upsetting as he is not
related to NL Dawson or FG Dawson despite what the surnames would suggest] I
produce the letters sent to me as exhibit ADD 1. I find it quite disgusting
that a complete stranger to me can repeatedly send me unwanted letters, with
distressing contents, and cause unimaginable distress to the whole of my family.
At one point I moved house, and the letters briefly stopped, however they soon
continued again at my new address. I found this quite upsetting that someone
was determined to track down my new address without my permission. signed
A. D. DAWSON
Witness Statement by Paul NUTTEING made at * police station at 08. 30 on
29th May, 2000 to the same WPC who had warned me concerning 1997 Protection from
Harassment Act only 10 days earlier on the 19 may, 2000 so was fully aware of the
position I was in. Local police will not release a copy of the following
statement so I have to rely on a near contemporaneous version made about 11. 00
on 29th May, 2000.
On 27th May, 2000 I was at Dolphin Pub. About 22. 00
Stella CONSTANT and Christina GARMAN [married name Edwards] arrive. About 22.
45 Stella came over to me and I said loudly (deliberately to be witnessed by
independent people nearby, but not shouting "Go to the other end of the pub".
She did not, so I went to the toilet. She was sitting on my seat on my return
talking to I. H. So I picked up my glass and went to another table, talking to D.
J. and A. J. Stella came over again and I said "Put anything in writing" and
went to the other end of the pub. I quickly finished the rest of my pint, asked
B. (a pub acquaintance) to get my coat from the other end of the pub and I left
about 23. 05. I went home to bed. About 23. 50-23. 55 there was a
rattling of the letterbox, not excessively loudly. I crept downstairs without
putting on the light. The noise from outside my door attracted the attention of
the next-door neighbour B. Hack. Mr Hack told the woman outside that "I am
probably still down the pub". The woman replied "Paul left the pub before I
did", at this point I recognised the voice of Stella CONSTANT and the silouette
from the street light casting a shadow on the glass panel of the front door.
Stella CONSTANT then wandered off down the road. Stella CONSTANT returned
(about 2 minutes before my first 999 call). She started kicking the front door
and trying to open the lock with her keys or something. The glass panel meant I
had a reasonable view of what she was up to as I again had crept downstairs with
no interior light on. The noise of her kicking is probably recorded on the 999
tape record of all 999 calls. Mr B. Hack came out again and said he would
phone the police. Stella CONSTANT, as I recognised her voice again said "The man
here has been sending me poison pen letters". Mr B. HACK then had a complete
change of attitude going by his change of voice. [ I know he must have
, coincidentely, received poison pen letters as I accidently intercepted one
delivered to my address by mistake. Only a 30 second conversation with this
evil bitch is enough to corrupt someone] Mr HACK became helpful and said
"Paul might be around * "giving her the exact address. L. H. a near neighbour
to these premises phoned me about a large window just being smashed. I
immediately phoned 999 for the second time as I was still waiting for police
attendance. At 00. 38 L. H phoned again because I had not turned up. I
dialled 999 for the third time to say I was going round to * to board-up because
of the excessive rain and wind that night. At that time I estimated the cost of
replacing a 10 ft by 6 ft by 8 mm thick plate-glass window to be £500 [later
revised upwards]. I did not give permission for anyone to interfere with the
window [standard police speak in these circumstances] signed P. Nutteing [I
later learned from another near neighbour _ _ at _ __ that she had gone out in
the rain and witnessed Stella CONSTANT kicking in the window in a very specific
manner ****. This neighbour then pointedly asked Stella CONSTANT whether she
had just broken the window and Stella Constant replied "yes" she then wandered
off down the road. The neighbour phoned the police and then 3 weeks later made
a statement about these events also not released as a copy by local police to me
. The WPC did not believe me when I said the offender was a social worker. ]
Half of this window showing the portion patched with perspex
until compensation came from this evil woman. The rest of the window was cracked
so braced-up, a metre rule is laid between the two red circles. This glass
weighed 130 Kg or 2 1/2 hundredweight or about twice the weight of the criminal
herself. Following is a copy of the 500 pound settlement cheque for smashing
this window signed by K D Dawson the husband of this grade one nutter. Someone should have told her the Sicilian proverb: "Revenge is
a dish best served cold". The window was kicked with such violence that all the
broken glass was on the outside without a single tiny piece inside. Make sure
you never put yourself in the position of being on the receiving end of this
woman's feet in the early hours of the morning or your head or body could end up
looking like this window.
Proper Evidence
Other Evidence From the archives of Southampton Council Register of Electors
for 16 Feb 1978 to 16 Feb 1979 showing the names Stella CONSTANT and Paul
NUTTEING living at the same address of 200 Empress Rd, Southampton.
From
Bugle Street Registry Office, Southampton, two birth certificates: 1
Naomi Leafe-Marie DAWSON born 27 Nov 1976, mother- Stella Maria CONSTANT and
father-Kelvin Derrick DAWSON registered on 21 Dec 1976
2
Fian Gerald DAWSON born 27 OCT 1978- mother Stella Maria CONSTANT and father
blank, registered on 28 November 1978 Copy of
the birth certificate of Fian Gerald DAWSON
Copy of the Salisbury
Journal (weekly newspaper) 02 Dec 1999 page 63 a public notice "Would anyone
knowing how the son of Stella Constant known as Fian Dawson can be related to
Kelvin Dawson , all of Salisbury, please contact Paul Nutteing ... [postal
address] .. " Hampshire
Copy of Southern Evening Echo (regional
daily) March 07, 1984 - Top of front page. Title -
Machete husband is overpowered. Police laid siege to a country cottage near
Salisbury after a middle-aged man went bezerk with a sword and a machete.
After climbing in through an upstairs window, officers managed to disarm and
overpower the man and the drama ended without injury. The alarm was raised
shortly after midnight yesterday when the man's wife made a 999 call to the
police claiming her husband had "gone mad" at their home [Heron Wood] in Middle
Woodford. Two police officers reached the scene to find that the woman and
another couple had fled the house but the man , aged 59, had locked himself in
wielding the sword and machete. Police reinforcements were called in , and
after surrounding the property and gaining access through a window, they ended
the siege with a broken pane of glass the only casualty. The man was taken
for treatment at hospital [ The Manor] under the Mental Health Act. His
identity was not revealed. A police spokesman said "It is most unlikely
that any charges will be preferred.
The same story is reported on the
front page of the Salisbury Journal of 08 March 1984 titled "Police Seize Armed
Man" [ The man referred to was the Father of S. M. Constant a Michael Ellis
CONSTANT, this information came courtesy of Christina Garman (now Edwards), note
the time of this event as shortly after midnight the same time of psychiatric
excursions of the daughter. ] Their divorce soon followed this event
Decree Nisi Absolute of Michael
Ellis Constant and Honoria Eileen Constant , May 12, 1986
I
managed to trace someone who lived with us in the mid 1970s. I specifically
asked him if he could remember any psychiatrically significant events or bizarre
night time activities concerning the behaviour of S. M. Constant and whether he
remembered an incident of a stabbing of a certain named person, not leading him
any more than that. This is his reply dated 25th August 1999. How nice
to hear from you after all these years. I am sorry that your contacting me has
been prompted by obviously less than happier circumstances. I am writing this
by return, I am going to France tomorrow. After time to think it through I may
be able to supply more accurate information. Much time has gone by and memories
of those years in Soton have not been revisited in a long while. We may have to
enter some sort of dialogue in order to tease out the information that you
want, realising differences between want and wish to hear and probably not really
wanting to hear any of it. I shall start simply. I remember Stella, first
met in the Onslow, me, you, perhaps Richard [pigshit], then Stella and her boy
friend (nameless in my memory but slightly tubby with a very wispy beard and a
Morris Minor). They had both started at the teacher training college on the
Avenue (LSU?). She had dropped out, he had not. He was her boyfriend since
secondary school and from his permanently pained expression, her protector. She
was strikingly attractive, petite, elfin faced with deep dark eyes but poor teeth
. Over the next year or so the couple often joined us socially in the various
pubs that we drank in. My relationship with Stella was not that good. I
remember one night I had been to a party, glass had entered my shoe and cut my
foot. As I was cleaning my injury in my room the couple entered, they were
obviously upset. He did most of the talking. The problem seemed to be that
she thought I didn't like her. I seem to remember this was resolved with the
agreement that though we would never be close, there was never any
previous, intentional animosity on my part and that I would never cause her harm
physically, mentally or verbally. This may be a sign of unbalanced
behaviour, certainly this is the only time I ever experienced this sort of
scenario. I thought little of matter at the time. I, making this clear to them
as well, was more interested in cleaning the glass from my foot. This
incident may have happened at 200 Empress Rd, I am sure it did. It may have been
after she * , my memory of its geography and timing is vague. Now the
incident that I remember that interests you is as I described it to you all
those years ago. At the time you and Stella were in your relationship, I
remember that I tried to remain uninvolved with it, let you get on with it as you
both seemed to protect your privacy, a difficult thing to do in a shared house.
Neither of you discussed your relationship apart from the occasional
word, perhaps to explain things. It was all a bit of a mystery to me. One night
yes about 2. 00 am perhaps. Stella came into my room and climbed into my bed
even before I was awake, the touch of her hand on the back of my neck woke me.
She was upset and wanted comforting. Due to your relationship I did not comfort
her and due to her lack of personal hygiene she was told to leave very quickly.
This she did. I do not remember where she went after she left me. I have a
feeling that she rejoined you because I vaguely remember an argument. I know
that the next morning you questioned me about Stella's movements and I am sure I
told you what happened as I have described it above. I think I knew, we all
knew, that she was pregnant at that time. I remember one other incident after
that. Perhaps it was when I took time off work because of 'flu. I had
disappeared, thought to have gone off with friends from the shebbeen, but in fact
ill in my room for 2-3 days. I got up, eventually, one afternoon to go out and
phone work and found Stella talking to a man *. She said he was an old friend
or even a previous landlord of hers. I seem to get the feeling that he was a
regular visitor. This occurred well into her pregnancy, as she was quite big by
then. I do not have any recollection of a stabbing incident. Though it
does seem to ring a bell. Again the name _ _ seems familiar. However I cannot
link it to anybody. Well that's it. I think you knew all this anyway. I
am still working on the exact date I left Soton. At the moment as far as I can
work it out it was towards the end of July 1976. I am sorry that you have been
trying to phone but I was busy with our _ _ _. However the BT Call Minder does
work like an answer phone, so I was aware of someone trying to contact me. I am
going to leave this letter now but over the next few days I will be thinking and
trying to remember more details. If you want more information then we may have
to enter a dialogue in order to jog our memories. It may even be nice to
exchange news at a later date. Call me if you like after Monday next week.
Best Wishes _ _
Four letters constituting a round robin with
name, address, signature and dates 20 to 22 Aug 2000 with the same minimalist
statement :- "Dear Mr Nutteing, Please do not send me any more letters to me. "
signed _ From Mr K D Dawson of 4 Nelson Rd, Salisbury, Mrs P Dawson of 7 Maple
Croft, Ridings Mead, Salisbury, Mr A Dawson of 21 Wordsworth Rd, Salisbury and Mrs
H E Constant of 6 Elliot Green, Winterbourne Gunner, Wilts
Forensic Photographic Evidence of Perjury
Three dated
pieces of photographic evidence to show that myself, Stella CONSTANT and Leafe
were living together as a family between June 1977 and June 1978. These photos
are dated 9 July 1977 showing when we went to Surrey for my sister's wedding.
Second photo February 1978, when she had just conceived Fian, this photo taken by
me shows the now ex-friend of Stella Constant with her 9 month old son with
Stella Constant and Leafe all sitting in the front room at home in Empress
Rd, Southampton. This ex-friend , Janice S. Conroy will not date this photo more
precisely, her husband even gave me a completely bogus date so I had to get a
copy of the birth certificate of her son for dating purposes. I assume precisely
because she has broken off a 20 year friendship with S M Constant she is not on
speaking terms with me either. This photo is negative number 1 on the contact
sheet reprinted a bit further down this file. She had arrived on
a Saturday morning about 8 to 8. 30 am by public transport from her New Forest
home requiring 2 changes of bus. There must have been some extra special reason
for this journey at this time of morning but she has totally clammed-up. I
don't remember her visiting on any other occasion. Dating of this photo was an
interesting exercise. The above image is cropped down a bit and could so easily
have shown a dateable newspaper in the domestic clutter in this photo or the
others on the same strip of negatives but nothing useful. Nothing on the photo
wallet either.
There are 3 pieces of indisputable evidence the (younger) boy was born 05
May 1977 and the (older) girl Leafe was born 27 Nov 1976. The third piece of all
things is from my garden shed. There is a cushion from the sofa in this picture
I sometimes use as a kneeler. The repeat pattern on the covering is such that
10 stripes cover 240 mm. The complete negative / print shows more of the sofa
than in the above image. Taking into account that the girl is nearer the camera,
level with the front of the sofa , and the boy set back about half way to the
back of the sofa. Measuring the sitting height of body and head and multiplying
by 1.79 (from anthropometric chart for sitting heights/ages and 5 per cent
allowance for slouched attitude ) to give full body height and scaling for the
front of the sofa , gives a height of 785 mm. From standard growth chart for the
average girl , height versus age , equates to 16 months. For the boy measuring
and scaling gives height of 725 mm. Again for average growth chart for boys
corresponds to an age of 9 months. So adding to birth dates gives a dating of
the photo to Feb / March 1978. Fian was conceived February 1978.
I know a child health worker and she agreed to put ages to the kids in the
picture. Her professional opinion is the younger boy is between 8 and 10 months.
He is sitting unsupported which is according to her a developmental benchmark
achieved by the age of 6 months in normal circumstances. The older girl she
assessed as between 1 year and 18 months.
Then in March 2002 I re-looked at these photos under a strong magnifier. In
part of the toys and domestic clutter at 200 Empress Rd there looked like a bit
of a newspaper laying sideways-on behind an open lattice (1970s ?) shopping bag
that I had not noticed before. From negative numbered 5 on the contact sheet
reprinted further down Then this part of the image magnified. Then
this area of text enlarged and rotated 100 degrees next to a copy from an archive
microfilm version of the Southern Echo of Monday, 27 Feb, 1978 I have now got a professional full-tone
photographic magnified print of this area , about x12 linear or in area terms
about 150 times the original size. I have not corrected for the skew or aspect
change due to the original newspaper lying on a slant. Also note the shadow of
the white lattice work of the shopping bag onto the newspaper and wall behind.
Note the discontinuity of the shadow due to the newspaper flopping over. How
anyone could fabricate such an evidential photo right on the limits of the grain
of the film would be quite a feat for even the CIA or MI6 etc. Ainsleys Darkroom
For individual attention in photographic processing and advice by someone
who has been doing dark room work for perhaps 30 years .
This is from
genuine of the time negative. Forensically it is Kodacolor II film which was
only manufactured 1973 to 1984 the code number along the edge means it was
manufactured 1977. For more technical information regarding dating of old
negatives go to the Usenet archives (Google groups etc) for group
rec.photo.film+labs and keyword "nutteing". Amazingly just because of the colour
caste of the film itself when placed on a lightbox Ainsley could say from just
looking at these negatives that they were from the mid to late 70s. No chance of
this being computer manipulated imagery copy transferred to 35 mm negative apart
from the technical difficulty of overlaying the shadow of the shopping basket
over the upper part of the curved newspaper. In 20 years time how will people be
able to do the equivalent when there is only digital cameras with no negatives
with any amount of possibility for manipulation of material. This enlarged
image shows the readable text caption with the ascenders G, h and d of Greyhound
then the dot on the I and decender g of racing (marked above C), the stars
marked below each S in clear areas, the edge of paper marked E , the white area
between paragraphs marked W and the distinctive line of 3 words above the mark
3 - two long words either side of a central short word "Sandown and Shanklin".
It was very rare for this "Greyhound racing " caption to appear at the right
hand edge of the sheet and a pair of "star" dividers near this caption were only
used on this one issue of "the Echo" , checking all editions from 2 months before
this Monday, 27 Feb 1978 edition to 3 months after except the 3 column version on
09 January. Taking measurements on the archive paper and the enlarged section
of negative. Taking as a unit of measurement the distance between the top of the
black caption and the star in the first column. Then in the second column the
length from black bar to the inter-paragraph white bar is 71 per cent in both
cases and distance from the black bar to the second star is 135 per cent in both
cases. And now for the doubting thomases the only 3 possible editions of the
Echo for the 2 months from 01 Feb 1978 to 31 Mar 1978 where the "Greyhound
racing" caption appeared on the right hand edge reprinted here blurred
deliberately for better comparison of pattern rather than text. Having to read the local sports results of a quarter of a century ago; the
things you end up doing to fight corruption so that those charged with perjury
and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice can't wriggle out of it. More of
the only such images for 1978 with "Greyhound racing" at the edge this time
covering all issues of the months January and April. There is no point in
checking any further in the Echo archive (before January or after April) because
of the ages of the children shown in the negative of S M Constant with Janice
Conroy (negative 1 on the contact sheet below). The first has the caption over 3
columns and a different type-face
I think I have found a new vocation as Forensic Evidence Investigator. This
is fully forensically admissible evidence that Stella Maria CONSTANT and Kelvin
Derrick DAWSON committed perjury in their statements to police so I don't have
to use the weasel word "allege" when referring to it. This photo of Leafe could
not have been taken before 27 Feb 1978. It is negative number 5 on the strip of
negatives. The picture of Jan and S M CONSTANT shown above is negative number 1
on the following contact print (first image numbered 0) so probably the Saturday
before i.e. 25 Feb 1978. The complete series of photos
shows toys all over the place and distinctive heavy play pen so the mother
cannot plead the case that she only happened to be visiting 200 Empress Rd when
I took these photos. She was clearly still living with me after 27 Feb 1978. Her
son was conceived late January to early February as she had a normal full term
pregnancy to birth on 26 October 1978.
Fourth photo dated 04 June 1978
when S M CONSTANT was four months pregnant with Fian. This was
taken in Surrey when me, Stella and daughter went up for my mother's sixtieth
birthday 4 June 1978. Another picture on the same strip of negatives shows my
cousin's daughter who was born 18th April 1978. Only the second time my mother
met her granddaughter. We slept in the spare room together at my mother's house
. If I remember rightly Stella had started to move out some things the week
before this weekend in Surrey.
A combination of photograph and testimony from a third party. The photo
taken by this independent person shows KD Dawson and SM Constant in an unusual
context. The testimony is the important matter as the person can place this
unusual circumstance with the situation that I was looking after Leafe for the
day and SM Constant was otherwise still living with me. The date of this event
was after 07 April 1978. So to sum up Stella Maria CONSTANT was living with me
from about June 1977 to the first week of June 1978.
Affidavits from Independent Witnesses
In a similar vein 6 affidavits from independent persons not family members
or friends:- 1
I can confirm that I was living with my former partner in the room adjoining
Stella and Kelvin's room at 4 - 6 Denzil Avenue, Southampton, until the winter of
1977/78 and that I continued to socialise with them after I moved to Portswood.
At the time I was living there, I was aware of your relationship with Stella and
I recall that the paternity of Leafe and Fian was in some doubt. I can only
state the truth as I recollect it. That there was widespread speculation that
you were their father. signed _ 2
In reply to your letter of 11th Sept, 2000, I can confirm that Stella CONSTANT
was living with you at Empress Rd in the early part of 1978. signed _ 3
I knew Stella CONSTANT during the last years of the 1970s. I was aware that
during that time she had a relationship with both yourself and Kelvin, her
boyfriend of some time. I have also visited her while she was living in your
house in Empress Rd and a flat she shared in Portswood after the birth of her
son. All these events happened so long ago that I do not remember specific
conversations that I had with Stella but I have been left with the enduring
impression that you were the father of both of her children. I hope the
problems you are having with Stella are resolved soon. signed _
4
Before requesting the following affidavit I had to establish whether he
remembered enough of our conversation without leading him as to when or the
subjects covered. Affidavit of _ _ _, team leader, social worker, _ social
services Dated 24th October 2000 I have known Paul NUTTEING since the 1970s.
Over this time I have seen him occasionally at times when people we both know
have been present or on rare chance meetings. On an occasion some time between
one and three years ago [actually 3 Oct 1999 as I recorded his home phone number
in my diary on that date] I ran into Paul in the Safeway supermarket in _ _. He
asked me for advice in relation to a personal difficulty he was experiencing.
He told me that he knew I was a social worker and that his difficulty was with a
social worker who worked in Salisbury. He told me that the difficulty related
to him being harassed by the social worker with whom he had previously had a
close relationship. Paul did not tell me her name and has not done so since
that time. He told me that the difficulty followed a paternity issue. I told
Paul something about the way that Social Services Departments work in general.
However, I was unable to tell him any details about Social Services in Salisbury
because I am unfamiliar with that organisation. signed _ [He allayed my
concerns about how the social services would deal with a rogue social worker.
I asked him how Social Services managers would deal with an employee who
divulged details of a serious social work enquiry before the details had been
made public. More generally he said there were enough checks and balances, in
particular, all major decisions had to go before a senior line manager. I did
not send a letter of concern to Wiltshire Social Services at that time October
1999 because of this conversation. But after the "Kristallnacht" window
smashing event, I had to contact Social Services, Wiltshire about this woman]
5
An affidavit from a pub acquaintance concerning the stalking behaviour of
Stella Constant on 28th May, 2000 (Kristalnacht) November 23, 2000 [I requested
an affidavit 6 months after the event without leading him in enquiry as to his
recollections before his writing of what he remembered] On the night in
question I was drinking in the Dolphin _ _ by _ _ _. As to the essential
happenings of that evening, or the order in which they unravelled I am somewhat
hazy, but what does stick is the embarrassment sustained. As I remember I
was drinking with Paul NUTTEING and A. J. We were joined by a female, who gave
every impression of being on friendly terms with Mr Nutteing. In fairly short
order Mr Nutteing left the table, taking his drink to the other side of the bar
room. At no point did he address the lady. Whatever Mr J. and myself were left
trying to engage in polite conversation with her. She appeared somewhat amused
by Mr Nutteing's actions. I think she later went over to Mr Nutteing with the
intention of buying him a drink. At that point she left the table A. J. leaned
over and said something to the effect she must be "an ex". Mr Nutteing made no
attempt to be either friendly, or for that matter in any way hostile, he just gave
the impression of wishing to have nothing to do with the lady in question, and
was evidently displeased by her appearance. I bumped into Mr Nutteing a few
days later in the same hostelry , and he apologised for the event. Saying the
woman in question was a "menace" and elaborated to some small extent.
Signed _ _
6 Part of the covering letter with this following
affidavit: Please find enclosed letter as promised. I hope this ends
happily-please let me know. I do feel guilty as I promised Stella I would not
disclose her secret. I would also like your assurance she will not find my
address ! or telephone number.
My home town is Southampton. I made a group of friends when I was 17 with
whom I stayed in contact. I was a teacher in Andover, Hants from 1975 to 1979.
During this time I returned to Southampton during the holidays and occasionally
at weekends to stay with my parents and would visit my friends, including Paul.
Paul's girlfriend was Stella who had already had a child, of which Paul was
the father, they lived in Empress Road in Paul's house. That particular holiday
(Christmas 1977) I was surprised when Stella told me *. Amongst the people who
met in the pub was a man Merv who often sat with the group. I did not like him
and had as little to do with him as possible [he was violent with a permanent
air of violence and threat about him]. During the holiday it was on the news on
TV that a young man had been killed in a street brawl in the Derby Road area.
[Mervyn Frank CLARKE of flat 16, No 5 Denzil Ave, Southampton, DOB 10 June, 1950 , Vienna. Coroner's report 10 Mar 1978] I recognised this as being the young man I did
not like from the pub and I was shocked. That evening I went to the pub and
Stella was very upset. She told me that she was pregnant. I asked her if it
was Paul or Kelvin's. She replied that it could have been Paul or Kelvin's or
the young man that had died the night before [early hours of Christmas eve
], which is why she was so upset and had been drinking. I promised never to
reveal this fact and I never would have if Paul had not been arrested.
signed _ [editorial-note, note this date and the date of birth of
Stella's son. This is probably an example of pseudocyesis - the conviction that
a non-pregnant woman is pregnant. She actually fell pregnant a couple of months
later. From a midwife I know the accepted normal (no medical irregularities )
for the gestation time of a human female is 38 to 42 weeks, 46 plus weeks is more
in the realm of hippopotamus. Probably due to amenorrhoea , anorexic induced
suppressed periods, this nutter thought she was pregnant. She stopped taking the
pill and got pregnant a couple of months later. ]
I was not aware of this person Mervyn even knowing S M CONSTANT let alone being
sexually involved with her and another possible sperm donor. As a result of this
above affidavit I did some research :- Cutting from the Southern Evening Echo
11 March 1978, page 3 Title : Open verdict on red light death riddle Southampton city coroner Mr. Michael Emanuel has recorded an
open verdict on a 27 year-old seaman who died after a street incident in the
city's red light district because inquest evidence failed to explain
"satisfactorily " how the man's injuries occurred. Mr Mervyn Clarke, who died in
Derby Road in the early hours [ just after midnight ] of last Christmas Eve, had
fatal head injuries consistent with a heavy fall -but also a mysterious neck
injury that could have been caused by a karate-type blow. The coroner, when
informed that the police had been directed by the Director of Public
Prosecutions not to proceed with criminal charges, said there was still no
evidence requiring the papers to be returned to the DPP. "Nevertheless, owing to
the lack of evidence as to exactly what has occurred my decision is to return an
open verdict, " he said. Det Sgt George Pothecary , of Southampton Central
CID, gave evidence yesterday of the police enquiry into Mr Clarke's death and
statements made by an overseas seaman, Mr Ron Daniel, who admitted pushing Mr
Clarke in the chest, causing him to fall. Mr Daniel, lodging at the
YMCA, Rockstone Place, Southampton and studying at the Nautical Training
School, Warsash, met Mr Clarke and his friend Mr William Shaw in the Dorchester
Arms, Onslow Road [ Onslow Rd and Derby Rd are either end of Denzil Avenue ].
Map of the area. O= The Onslow, D= The
Dorchester, B=bedsits of Kelvin Dawson and William Shaw and M= The murder
site. The incident that led to Mr Clarke's death happened after the trio had
trekked around Southampton's red light district looking for the club, with Mr
Clarke knocking on prostitute's doors from time to time asking the way and Mr
Shaw stopping people in the street. Det Sgt Pothecary said the police launched
a major enquiry and on Christmas Eve Mr Daniel made a statement at the Civic
Centre police station that "proved inaccurate ". He said a man had come from a
house in Derby Road and pushed Mr Clarke. On December 28, after further police
investigation , Mr Daniel was again taken to the police station but maintained
his story from 11. 15 until 1. 30 pm. After a break for lunch he greeted the
police with the words :"I pushed him". The police officer told the coroner that
Mr Daniel said he had been frightened to tell the truth because he thought he
would go to prison. Home Office pathologist, Dr Peter Pullar, said death was
caused by massive brain haemorrhage, consistent with the head injuries although
there was no skull fracture. There was a possibility the coroner commented that
the mystery neck injury could have been caused by something like a projection
from a kerb.
I never knew or knew of Mr Daniel, William Shaw I knew as Will only as someone
around and about at the time. I did not know that Stella CONSTANT knew Merv let
alone was sexually involved with him. I knew of 6 people sexually involved with
Stella CONSTANT , going around people requesting affidavits turned up this one
and one other. I asked someone else if they would write an affidavit but they
refused but did admit to sexual liaisons with this at least 8 times ridden
"office bicycle". Constant by name but not by nature. She made sure she slept
around enough to get pregnant so she could supply a ready made family for her
intended infertile husband Kelvin Derrick Dawson. This promiscuous behaviour of
S. M. Constant meant it was like trying to live with a prostitute. Mr Clarke
had lived at flat 16 , No 5 Denzil Ave, Mr Shaw at flat 5 and Kelvin DAWSON at
flat 7 at these infamous "superflats" in Denzil Ave. On the day after Boxing
Day of these events "Will" somehow found where I lived and descended on me with
a bottle of whisky of which he had already, and obviously, drunk half of the
bottle. He told me that Stella CONSTANT had been involved somehow with these
events. I disbelieved him because as far as I was aware she was at her family
home Heron Wood, Middle Woodford, Wiltshire for Christmas as usual and he was
obviously sloshed. From the affidavit above it was more than likely she was
staying with Kelvin DAWSON in Denzil Avenue on Christmas Eve. Mr Shaw didn't go
into any more detail. There is motive , method and opportunity to implicate S M
CONSTANT in this murder. I have twice been on the receiving end of this woman's
feet in the small hours of the morning. If Mr Clarke had denied the possibility
of being the father for S M CONSTANT's phantom (at that time) pregnancy and
someone else had felled him to the ground then a soft shoe kick from this woman
could well have been the "karate-type blow" and at exactly the right time of
night. Of the three kicking events one kick from this woman, bare-feet at the
time, split one of the wood panels in a heavy Victorian wooden door (when I
refused to have sex with one of her sisters). The others recently in 2000, was
enough to smash a 10 foot by 6 foot plate-glass window, and the other recorded on
police tape of 999 calls. All kicking occurrances were situations when this
dangerous woman could not get her way.
A personal letter from a family friend of Stella's from the 1970s up to
the time of my input [ pictured in frame 1 of the contact prints above ]. I had
previously sent my "paternity treatise", copy of Fian's birth certificate, some
medical info and colour pictures of me, Stella and Leafe as an obvious family
group in June 1978 in Surrey with my extended family. In other words the same
material as full family members of Stella. Immediately to the reply below I
had written enquiring whether she was my daughter's informant about my identity
.
Dear Paul 20 July 1999
I was startled to receive your letter but I think it would be best if I
draft out a reply. Stella and I have not been friends for well over a year
now so I don't know about anything that may be going on at the moment. I never
knew much about who the children's fathers were except that she said Leafe was
your's and Fian Kelvin's. I didn't really think it was any of my business.
I've never had much conversation (if any) with either of the children and
they certainly would never have come to me asking who their father was. I
do feel a bit sorry for your situation but the only bit of information I can
give is that I think Fian looks like Kelvin's mother - obviously a very
subjective judgement. I hope you will not write to me or contact me any
more as although Stella and I are no longer friends I feel very uncomfortable
being drawn into this. I wish you well and hope that you manage to sort all
this out Yours sincerely _
Other Evidence
Taped telephone call from Fian DAWSON, trainee lawyer, on 04 Sept 1999 time
00.37. [pick up receiver, nothing said by either party for 5 seconds]
Fian__ Hello, Hello there, Hello Paul Paul__ Hello F_____ Paul
NUTTEING, I'm sorry if I woke you, this is Fian DAWSON here P_____ Oh
hello, yes F_____ You've been trying to contact me for some time, is that
right? P_____ Yes F_____ I know it is. I've read every one of your
letters dating back quite a while now and thought I'd better just ring you and
tell that even if you are my father err to be honest I think that is quite a
remote possibility cos I don't look anything like the photos you sent me and I
don't look anything like Leafe. Er, I do actually bear quite a resemblance to my
father and I don't want anything to do with you and perhaps you might like to
stop the letters to the family and people that we know OK. Would that be a
possibility? P_____ I'm afraid it would have to be something in writing or
something F_____ How do you mean something in writing, that's P_____ Sorry
F_____ You want me to make it clear in writing that I don't want anything to
do with you P_____ Well something like blood groups or something F_____
Blood groups don't prove anything. I'm not even going to tell you anything even
if you were my father I mean P_____ No it just proves the negative sort of
case I agree F_____ Listen to me please. Even if you were my father I
wouldn't want anything to do with you OK. Do you understand that? P_____
Well I mean all I've got ... F_____ Not about proving negatives or positives
. You made it quite clear that you're not a very pleasant person P_____
[guffaw] F_____ I don't want anything to do with you and I don't want any
more letters and I don't want to find out that any more of my family or friends
have got any letters. I mean you can send them, fine, but you're not going to get
anywhere, OK. You're talking to me and that's who you've been trying to talk to
for a very long time P_____ You're just a voice on the phone, I'm afraid
F_____ I'm a voice on the end of a phone , for fucks sake, WHAT, WHAT, Oh jezus
who do you think I am, you think I'm Kelvin or someone like that P_____ I've
no idea, you're just ... F_____
...
just a voice on the end of the phone and you're some madman that keeps sending
me fucked-up letters ok. P_____ I wouldn't know about that F_____ Tell
me about it OK. Look I don't want to hear them anymore. I don't want to read
them anymore OK and so there is no more reason for you to send any more of them
. I've made it quite clear to you already that if you were my father and there
is fuck-all possibility of that. I don't give a crap OK about deformed legs and
Madelung wrists
Madelung
or whatever, OK, or you know, the number of weeks my mother was
living with you or the number of weeks my dad was living with her. Absolute
bullshit OK. If you are my father and I told you before you're not OK, you
really aren't. I wouldn't want anything to do with you OK. P_____ Well
it's an interesting point of view but I still haven't heard anything definite
F_____ Yeah, yeah I know its an interesting point of view but humour me and
put up with it. P_____ Sorry F_____ Just put up with it, that's my point
of view, ok. I don't want anything to do with you. You can rot in hell as
far as I am concerned OK. P_____ Well, I'm afraid, you're phone call just
makes everything worse. F_____ How, how, tell me please. Do you really think
that I want anything to do with you, really P_____ Well I don't know what
you're dealings with your mother is or anything F_____ How do you mean
P_____ What sort of a hold she's got over you. F_____ What sort of a
hold she's got over me, please, she's my mother for god's sake ok P_____ I
know exactly what she's like, yes F_____ I know what you think she's like and
everything. This is a phone call to put an end to all this. P_____ No, a
phone call doesn't do anything F_____ Yes it does, trust me P_____ Well
you're the trainee lawyer or whatever aren't you (probably now with Parker Bullen, Salisbury / Andover ) F_____ Yes I know I am
P_____ Well you know nothing can be settled as a result of a phone call
F_____ Yes, I do, so what do you want P_____ Well I ... F_____ Go
on, its your turn, say what you want P_____ You've just woken me up, I'm just
trying to think F_____ It was the very least I could do to wake you up
really P_____ Well I'm going to put the phone down, Ciao BT CLI Telephone
number 01722 412 ... called at 00.37 today .... [Blatant contravention of
section 43 of the 1984 Telecommunications Act especially the admission of
improper use in his last statement. ] Fian Dawson (part) sound
recording 1. 04M
Taped telephone call (part) from Leafe DAWSON 20 March 1997 Leafe
....... The thing is Dad [K D Dawson] had a quite unusual, quite a rare blood
group so that sort of balances out so I know that for sure. [me being her
biological father] Whatever Fian is I don't know ....... [This was totally
unforced, volunteered information at the time I had forgotten what my own blood
group was]
Taped telephone call (part) From Leafe DAWSON 27
April 1997 .... Quite interesting actually, 'cause, really strange why , looked at
the pictures [I had sent Leafe of me as a youngster], gosh, that's Fian, really
strange. The little passport picture, the little passport one of you, [of me
aged about 17 ] black and white. Looks i-i-identical to Fian , god!, oh my gosh
............ [Again totally volunteered information , she later lied about this
conversation ]
Some evidence of the physical harassment of myself by Stella Constant Tape
recording of the BT CLI recorded by myself and a cassette copy sent to Salisbury
Police as evidence and a copy of Fax sent to DC Memory and WPC Griffin of
Salisbury Police
And the confirmation fax report with the all
important machine CLI of Salisbury Police CID identifier of their fax line.
(Actual time was 10.50 as fax clock was slow)
FAO DC
Memory and WPC Griffin 02 Nov, 2000 Hampshire Police have told me to contact you
direct. At 01. 31 on 01 Nov 2000 someone on Salisbury (NTL) phone 01722
5065 .. tried waking me on my home phone. I do not know the identity of this
line. The only person to do this sort of thing previously is the evil bitch
Stella Maria Constant of 4 Nelson Road, Salisbury From , signature P.
Nutteing
Five sections up is an example of a letter in reply to a letter of mine that
annoyed a one-time friend of Stella Constant and now similarly. Solicitor's letter from Trethowans solicitors My letter
response to the above letter from a New St, Salisbury solicitor as an example of
the sort of letter I would expect most people would send if they found a letter
annoying, so by return of post shouting capital letters but not green ink:-
Copy circulated to DC Memory and WPC Griffin From P. Nutteing and
address TECHNICALLY YOU SENT ME AN ANONYMOUS LETTER [no name of the
solicitor just an indecipherable squiggle of a signature]. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES
I TAKE GREAT EXCEPTION TO THIS. ALL MY LETTERS CONCERNING THE DOUBLE PATERNITY
DISPUTE WITH YOUR CLIENT MY DETAILS ARE FULLY DISCLOSED. I HAVE THE MORAL
INTEGRITY AND COURAGE OF MY CONVICTIONS TO PUT ALL MY STATEMENTS IN WRITING THEY
CAN THEN BE TESTED AND IF FOUND WANTING (NOTHING FOUND SO FAR) AND CAN THEN HAVE
THEM BOUNCING BACK TO ME. YOUR CLIENT RELIES ON LIES, THREATS, INTIMIDATION AND
VIOLENCE AND NOT A SINGLE ITEM IN WRITING FOR OBVIOUS REASONS. Nevertheless
I have interpreted your email address as belonging to an Ian Singleton and will
address the letter to that name. 05 Sept 2000 Dear Mr Singleton I
take issue with you in your use of the word "allege" in the first line of your
letter. Either you are implying that Hampshire Police have prosecuted the wrong
woman or you have been misdirected by your client. Knowing the nature of the
woman I expect the latter. Hampshire Police have informed me that Re: Crime
Reference 008089/00 criminal damage on 28 May at premises * , that your client
was arrested, charged and cautioned for this offence. Please correct your
records that the window in question is 10 ft x 6 ft. [there follows a lengthy
explanation on the determination of compensation] If I don't get a satisfactory
response to this letter then I reserve the right to increase my claim to nearer
£940. I also reserve the right to take your client to court to obtain
compensation. As of this date I have not started legal proceedings against your
client. Yours signed P. Nutteing [Despite or because of this letter 10
days later I received from him a full settlement cheque]
SCHEDULE OF LETTERS SENT BY PAUL NUTTEING
SMC - Stella Constant, KDD
- Kelvin Dawson, LM - Lynn Middleton, JBS - John Stoddart PD - Pauline Dawson, HEC
- Honoria Constant, ADD - Andrew Dawson, MWD - Madelung Wrist Deformity medical
research paper in fairly lay terms
Number ... Date ... .. Recipient ... ... ... Topic
1 ... ... 8 Jul 97 ... SMC ... ... ... "I've now listened to the messages ... "
1 ... ... 13 Mar 99 ... SMC ... ... ... "I don't rate your solicitor much ... "
1 ... ... 11 Ap 99 ... .. KDD ... ... ... Paternity Treatise + MWD + June 1978
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... +photos + Blood donor's book copy
1 ... ... 26 Ap 99 ... .. PD ... ... ... Ditto
1 ... ... 12 May 99 ... HEC ... ... ... Ditto
1 ... ... 7 Jun 99 ... ADD ... ... ... Ditto
1 ... ... 21 Jul 99 ... KDD ... ... ... Informing intention going into the public domain
1 ... ... 6 Jan 00 ... SMC ... ... ... Postcard about publishing in the public domain
4 ... ... 29 Mar 00 ... KDD, ADD, HEC, PD ... With printed version of public domain story
1 ... ... 30 May 00 ... .. LM ... ... ... Suicide of SMC concerns LM forwarded to JBS
13
(NOT hundreds) Total of letters sent to the people named on the charge sheet.
Letter from Wiltshire County Council 02 June 2000 Dear Mr Nutteing I
acknowledge receipt of your letter of 30 May. I am not responsible manager for
Stella Constant, who works within Children & Families Division of Wiltshire
County Council's Social Services Department, whereas I am responsible for staff
working in the Adult Care Division. Consequently I have passed your letter and
its contents to Mr John Stoddart, Area Manager, Children & Families, Kennet
& Salisbury. Mr Stoddart is currently on leave until Tuesday 6th June, but I
am sure he will respond to your letter after that. Yors sincerely L. M
I tried getting some sort of affidavit from someone I have full name and
address for I will call J who was stabbed sometime late 1977 or early 1978. The
event occurred while I was babysitting and I was not present. It occurred in the
toilets of a West Indian night-club. The people involved were J, Stella CONSTANT
and maybe a third party. J will not discuss let alone write an affidavit about
this incident that occurred again at the Jekyl and Hyde hour about midnight.
It was in J's bed-sit in Denzil Avenue, Southampton in December 1975 I must
have witnessed the first of these Jekyl and Hyde transformations. Again about
midnight but without corroboration from either J or the now un-remembered other
person I will not go into detail here. Lets just call it inappropriate
behaviour.
The CPS are aware or should be aware of the following which , by careful
cross-comparison of all the testimony in this file, is manifest:- 1
Neither the police or CPS are in possession of the letter that I was
arrested for sending. This letter is safely in my possession. Prosecution for
sending a letter that is still in the hands of the sender is just plain
ridiculous. All that lot have only seen copies of the letter that I allegedly
sent. This letter was unopened before being sent to the Belfast "National
Return Letter Centre" where it was then legally opened to reveal the return
address to me and forwarded back to me. 2
There is a serious problem with the testimony of John Barton STODDART which
will necessitate high level investigation by social services, "using a false
instrument" , namely letter JBS1. He has submitted a forged letter JBS1 as the
principal evidence against me. This letter is not my writing or my signature or
my phrasing. The term "illegal activities" would appear to be a term much
used in Social Services speak. On the first page of the statement by Stella
Constant on the 14 April 2000 she admits to earlier perjury then goes on to
provably lie about where she was living between June 1977 and June 1978.
Kelvin Dawson repeated this same provable lie about where his now missus was
living between June 1977 and June 1978. There is a serious irregularity in the
statement of Stella CONSTANT on 22 August 2000 see the editorial note. If the
three missing pages relate to mental health aspects behind the broken window
incident then this irregularity with JBS1 taken together would suggest something
that moves this whole farrago onto a different plain. She had been witnessed by
a neighbour "SMC- accidentely damage" by willfuly kicking in the window, the actions
of a deranged psychotic lunatic. 2 To get sufficient gravitas for police
involvement Stella Maria CONSTANT and Kelvin Derrick DAWSON did wilfully and
provably make in a major part of their statements false statements to police and
hence malicious prosecution of myself. Whether I am found guilty or innocent
they will both have a counter action against them. After all I have only sent
some informative letters that the junk-mail industry does every day to millions
of people.
If there is any moral justice Stella Maria CONSTANT, social
worker with Children and Families section of Wiltshire Social Services, should be
prosecuted for the psychological and emotional abuse of her own children for
deliberately putting them through all this hell. From a senior social worker I
know he told me there are two sorts of people best placed to know exactly the
best way to disrupt families - social workers and child psychologists
.
Because Stella Constant and John Stoddart have made provably false
statements to police in a conspiracy for malicious prosecution then all their
past processing of legal matters must now be suspect. Anyone who recognises
these names of Wiltshire Social Services personnel having given evidence against
themselves in child custody matters etc should have their own cases reviewed.
Charges will be the same as the Jeffrey Archer Trial (found guilty 19
July 2001); perjury, using a false instrument and conspiracy to pervert the
course of justice with an added charge of misfeasance (abuse of public
office)
Prior to the 1997 Protection from Harassment Act the "aggrieved" would have
had to go to court to obtain an injunction. This would require forensically
admissible evidence. This 1997 Act starts in the realm of civil law with no
requirement to show proper evidence as long as they make statements strong
enough to fool the police. Sections 2 onward of the act then fall in the realm
of criminal law.
Log of sites/files had taken down by the opposition in Wiltshire
Now only
readable by using the "Wayback Machine" The
Internet Archive and putting in the search box the original URL
20
Nov 2001 http://nutteing.freeservers.com Hello Paul Nutteing, Your web
site is in violation of our Acceptable Use Policy. Specifically, your page
contained material or content that is racist or otherwise offensive to others,
including content which aggravates, harasses, threatens, defames, or abuses
others. If you have any questions, you may refer to our Acceptable Use Policy
located at http://www.freeservers.com/policies/acceptable_use.html. Regards,
Abuse Team
10 April
2002 http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing2.htm Dear User, We have
received a number of complaints about the allegedly defamatory content of your
postings regarding { http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing2.htm }. We must
remind you that the Freeserve user conditions subject to which Freeserve is made
available to you require you not to use Freeserve "to transmit or post any
material which is defamatory, offensive or of an obscene or menacing character,
or which may, in our judgement, cause annoyance, inconvenience or anxiety to any
person." Your postings regarding { http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing2.htm }
put Freeserve at risk of libel proceedings and accordingly we will be suspending
your { http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing2.htm ) web-site as of 09:30
April{10}th 2002. However, if we receive your written undertaking that you will
remove the allegedly defamatory content from your web-site, then we will be happy
to reinstate your { http://www.divdev.fsnet.co.uk/nutteing2 ) web-site. Kind
Regards Freeserve Webmaster
Don't waste your time going to a Citizen's Advice Bureaux for advice on this
sort of thing. You will wait around for an hour then after they see you they
will come up with their usual useless reply, "get some advice from a solicitor".
This is the "Agony Aunt" story as printed in the Guardian Newspaper. The
replies are a load of useless moralising with no practical suggestions at all;
which was the reason for my submission. The information in all these internet
files is far more useful to anyone in similar circumstances. Guardian
Newspaper - Private Lives for 25 June 1999 If this article fails to emerge
from the Guardian archive then try clicking again.
Some further reading
that seems appropriate to this woman's behaviour Bullying
Fatuous
comment about the above site Ms Tucker knows full well that incompetent
social workers hide behind threats from their legal departments. She knows the
local government ombudsman will rarely look into complaints and that local and
national newspapers will not publish any material relating to such grievances.
Turning good money over to bloody lawyers in civil courts is not a valid
recourse. About the only outcome of legal nonsense is publicity so why not cut
out these expensive middlemen and go public from the outset. Publishing by the
aggrieved themselves details of incompetence and misdeeds of social workers is
thoroughly to be recommended for the public good and for very necessary
cathartic reasons.
The full reference to the oft-quoted figure of 30% false paternity.
From
Philipp, E. Discussion: moral, social and ethical
issues. In Law and Ethics of A.I.D. and Embryo Transfer.
Ciba Foundation Symposium (Vol. 17), G.E.W. Wostenholme
and D.W. Fitzsimons (Eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier, Excerpta
Medica, North-Holland, 1973,pp. 63-66.
Quote
PHILIPP:
We blood-tested some patients in a town in south-east England,
and found that 30% of the husbands could not have been the fathers
of their children. .........
KILLBRANDON:
Mr Philipp,surely the figure of 30% must be a minimum?
What you established was that 30% could not be the children of
their mother's husband,not that 70% of them were?
PHILLIPP:
Yes,it is a minimum. We were screening some female
patients by testing their husbands for their blood groups, because
we were interested in antibody formation in correlation with
the ABO groups as well as the rhesus groups. From our results
we suddenly realised that 30% of the children could not have
been fathered by the men whose blood group we analysed.
STALLWORTHY:
What was the extent of that group?:
PHILLIP
Not large - between 200 and 300 women - but large enough
to give a great shock.
J H EDWARDS:
........ Analysis of some blood group data ,making allowance for the
fact that one could not detect all the illegitimacies,showed that in the
1950s in the West Isleworth area about 50% of premarital conceptions
were not fathered by the apparent father. As the apparent fathers
were questioned while visiting their wives immediately after
the birth,most of them obviously thought they were the father. ....
End Quote
The book includes other material relating to "disguised paternity".
In another reference there was mention of
...Blood group studies indicate levels of paternal discrepancy
........ up to 20-30% .... Liverpool Flats study: McLaren cited in
Cohen J,1977.Reproduction. London: Butterworths
Another example of the very strange
employment criteria of Wiltshire Social Services Guardian Newspaper Archive
Type in "keith andrews" as keyword and read articles of 04 May, 2000 and 06
Dec 2000 and 23 April, 2000. From The Times of 04 April 2000 " Mr St Leger
(Keith Andrews) , (alias Marc Philip Justin Onslow Berkeley St Leger Curzon )
invented a whole new family tree.......claimed his mother was Joy Chantel Helene
de Burgoyne of Paris and Tours, and he had been married (bogously) to
Marie-Louise, daughter of the Duc de Brissac of Paris. " Also another case of
who is harassing who. Type in "laura fish" published on 02 April, 2001
Someone else on a more serious charge of child sexual abuse after false
allegations. Curiously this person's discontinuance notice from Wilts CPS was
almost the same day as mine February 26 2001 ; mine was February 27 2001 Wiltshire Newspapers
Archive Issue day 05 April 2001, title "Man's anger at sex abuse claim" , 46
year old Devizes man.
Another local case of Social Services incompetence
go to Echo Newspaper
and type in keywords collings gosport
About the only "text book " on
the 1997 Protection from Harassment act is The Law of Harassment and Stalking by
Paul Infield and Graham Platford published by Butterworths, 2000. It is available
inter-library loan from Aberystwyth University Library. It is useful for those
on the receiving end of stalking, hence the input from the Suzy Lamplugh Trust as
well as people finding themselves on the receiving end of the act used bogously
as in the case of animal welfare activists etc. That is being used to stifle
public protest a concern of Liberty. The impetus for the act was the manifest
stalking of Tracy Morgan by Anthony Burstow.
A reported case where the
anti-stalking law was used for its intended purpose again a man being stalked by
a woman. Wiltshire
Harassment Case
The following is a link to another David versus
Goliath battle , this time with Dorset County Council, Social Services 3 Families
"Revenge is a luscious fruit which you must leave to
ripen" - Emile Garboriau
If you have found this file in an archive then put keyword of "Nutteing" in a
search engine to find an updated version, also some sites do not support the .wav
sound files.
For anyone with further interest in this story then copies
of the affidavits, documentary evidence, photos or even taped phone calls, used as
evidence, could be made available. Obviously, outside a court environment, some
identifying features would have to be deleted.
